OSHA Inspection: LUCIANO RAMIREZ

Issued

2012-10-29 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a):  Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    This violation occurred on August 23, 2012, at least three (3) employees, were working in the support of  framing work, were exposed to struck-by hazards from falling material or equipment and were not wearing protective helmets.

Issued

2012-10-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a) (1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:      This violation occurred on August 23, 2012, at least one (1) employee was performing framing work using a Hitachi pneumatic nail gun without the use of eye protection.

Issued

2012-10-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b) (13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of 1926.502(k) developed and implemented:                                                                           This violation occurred on August 23, 2012, at the single family home located at 487 Oak Hills Lane in Fate, Texas 75132, at least one (1) employee was framing a two-story residence from top plates of the home without the use of fall protection. The employee was exposed to a potential fall hazard.

Issued

2012-10-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b) (13):  The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:    This violation occurred on August 23, 2012, where at least one (1) employee used the top step of a 6-foot step ladder to access the interior wall of a single family residence.