Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DAVID G. MARTIN, INC. COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DAVID G. MARTIN, INC. COMPANY in 9 DOMINIC LANE, CHESWICK, PA 15024 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 335924452.

Watch David G. Martin, INC. Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for David G. Martin, INC. Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9 DOMINIC LANE
City
CHESWICK
State
PA
ZIP
15024
Mailing
1001 STOTTLER ROAD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15235
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    a) Jobiste, 9 Dominic Lane, Cheswick, PA: On or about August 24, 2012, during water line installation activities, the employer did not ensure that workers were provided with trench and excavation safety training. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to an employee being in the trench which was measured to be approximately 5 1/2 feet in depth and no cave-in protection was in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could result in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift or after every rainstorm or other hazard increasing occurrence:    a) Jobiste, 9 Dominic Lane, Cheswick, PA: On or about August 24, 2012, during water line installation activities, the employer did not ensure that an appropraite trench inspection, conducted by a competent person, was done prior to the start of work. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to, not conducting a proper soil analysis and trench cave-in protection analysis before an employee was allowed to enter the trench, at a depth measured to be approximately 5 1/2 feet in depth, to perform work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.651 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Employees were not protected from excavated or other materials or equipment that could pose a hazard by falling or rolling into excavations. Protection was not provided by placing and keeping such materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61 m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that are sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary:    a) Jobiste, 9 Dominic Lane, Cheswick, PA: On or about August 24, 2012, during water line installation activities, the employer did not ensure that dirt removed from the excvatation dig was kept at least 2 feet back from the edge of the excavation. This dirt was removed from the dig and placed along the road side of the trench, within 2 feet from the edge of the trench.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of this section:     a) Jobiste, 9 Dominic Lane, Cheswick, PA: On or about August 24, 2012, during water line installation activities, the employer did not ensure that appropriate cave-in protection was provided in an excavation measured to be approximately 5 1/2 feet in depth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2300
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335924452.