Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: KNUTH BUILDING COMPANIES, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KNUTH BUILDING COMPANIES, LLC in 1158 WATERSTONE DR., GRAFTON, WI 53024 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 336707989.

Watch Knuth Building Companies, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Knuth Building Companies, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1158 WATERSTONE DR.
City
GRAFTON
State
WI
ZIP
53024
Mailing
W61 N727 MEQUON AVE., CEDARBURG, WI 53012
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1120.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    (a) The employer did not ensure that employee(s) were using fall protection on a residential building. The employee(s) were conducting framing carpentry and were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336707989.