SCARSDALE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: WHITE PLAINS ROOFING & SIDING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WHITE PLAINS ROOFING & SIDING, INC. in 1 BRADFORD RD., SCARSDALE, NY 10583 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338678238.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WHITE PLAINS ROOFING & SIDING, INC.
- Site address
- 1 BRADFORD RD.
- City
- SCARSDALE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10583
- Mailing
- 27 NEPPERHAN AVE., ELMSFORD, NY 10523
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold were not protected by a personal fall arrest system: location: front of house on or about: 1/31/13 a) Employees, engaged in roofing work from a ladder jack scaffold, were not protected from falling by a personal fall arrest system. The employees were exposed to a fall of 21 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: location: entire site on or about: 1/31/13 a) Employees were working from a ladder jack scaffold. The employees were not provided with scaffold safety training. NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who is involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. The training shall include the following topics, as applicable: location: entire site on or about: 1/31/13 a) Employees set up a ladder jack scaffold. The employees were not provided with scaffold safety training. NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems: location: roof on or about: 1/31/13 a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of 22 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. location: entire site on or about: 1/31/13 a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not protected from falling 22 feet. The employees were not provided with any fall protection training. NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did notl extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. location: rear of house on or about: 1/31/13 a) Employees were using a portable metal extension ladder to access the roof. The ladder did not extend 3 ft. above the roof. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections at WHITE PLAINS ROOFING & SIDING, INC.
WHITE PLAINS, NY—2006-06-20 00:00:00
WHITE PLAINS ROOFING & SIDING,INC.
View WHITE PLAINS ROOFING & SIDING, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
PORTLAND, OR—2026-07-17 00:00:00
317744797 - JBC ROOFING LLC
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-17 00:00:00
COBRA'S ROOFING LLC
SYRACUSE, NY—2026-07-17 00:00:00
NAMICELA HOME SOLUTIONS INC
BRADLEY, IL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
JUAN CRUZ DBA ROOFBOYS LLC
PONCE INLET, FL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
RESOLUTE ROOFING LLC
More inspections in NY
LIBERTY, NY—2026-07-17 00:00:00
SULLIVAN COUNTY CARE CENTER AT SUNSET LAKE
NEW YORK, NY—2026-07-17 00:00:00
VERGARA ELECTRICAL LLC
ONEONTA, NY—2026-07-17 00:00:00
APPLE CONVERTING, INC.
SYRACUSE, NY—2026-07-17 00:00:00
NAMICELA HOME SOLUTIONS INC
SYRACUSE, NY—2026-07-17 00:00:00
CRANESVILLE BLOCK CO., INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338678238.