Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION in 1155 PALE SAN VITORES ROAD, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 338797442.

Watch Hyatt Hotels Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hyatt Hotels Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1155 PALE SAN VITORES ROAD
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
1155 PALE SAN VITORES ROAD JAN-HENDRICK MEIDINGER - GENERAL MANAGER, TAMUNING, GU 96913
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
470
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.303 B01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(ii): Mechanical strength and durability, including, for parts designed to enclose and protect other equipment, the adequacy of the protection thus provided:  LaMiranda Kitchen: On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the Star Pro Max Panini Grill power cord was pulled form its fiittng and the live inner conductors were exposed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, disconnect boxes had no markings which indicated its purpose in the following locations;  A. Plant Room: Two disconnects installed near the heat machines, which energized lights and outlets.  B. Niji Japanese Kitchen: Two disconnects near the dishwashing area, which energized unknown equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, electrical equipment was not properly guarded and live wiring was exposed in the following locations;    A. Cooling Tower 1-2: Two knockouts were missing in the junction box CT1-2 each leaving a one inch opening and exposing live inner conductors.  B. LaMiranda Kitchen: The Tork Timer was missing an inner guard and the live inner conductors were exposed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.305 G01 IV A

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:   Niji Kitchen Electrical Closet: On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, a blue extension cords was used in lieu of permanent wiring to energize a strand lighting dimmer system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.305 G01 IV D

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(D): Flexible cords and/or cables were attached to building surfaces:   Niji Kitchen Electrical Closet: On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, a blue extension cords was attached to the building surface to energize a strand lighting dimmer system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:   Pool Pump Room: On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, a 50 gallon container of corrosive muriactic acid was not properly marked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:   Pool Pump Room: On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, a 50 gallon container of corrosive muriactic acid was not properly marked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Deleted Repeat 1 instance 470 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  Facility: On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not certify a written PPE Hazard Assessment had been preformed.   The Hyatt Regency Guam was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 315278275, Citation Number 02, Item Number 002, issued on 07/22/2011, with respect to a workplace located at 1155 Pale San Vitores Road, Tumon Bay, Guam, which became final order on 08/08/2011.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $200

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 470 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Facility: On February 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not develop or maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for employees who were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to; corrosive water treatment chemicals and irritative cleaning chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338797442.