TAMUNING, GU ·
OSHA Inspection: MG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in DUSIT PLACE OFFICE ROOM RENOVATION SAN VITORES RD., TAMUNING, GU 96931 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 348707019.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
- Site address
- DUSIT PLACE OFFICE ROOM RENOVATION SAN VITORES RD.
- City
- TAMUNING
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96931
- Mailing
- 139 KAYEN PUTION, DEDEDO, GU 96929
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,412 · Current $2,412
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about January 20, 2026 in the Dusit Place Hotel First floor office, an employee who was required to wear a 3M Particulate Respirator 9001, while using a chipping hammer to remove floor tiles was not fit tested prior to use.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2412
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. (Construction Reference 1926.103(a)): On or about January 20, 2026 in the Dusit Place Hotel first floor office, an employee wearing a 3M Particulate Respirator 9001 while using a chipping hammer to remove floor tiles, was not medically cleared prior to use.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2026
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. On or about January 20, 2026 in the Dusit Place Hotel First floor office, an employee was using a chipping hammer to remove floor tiles without any control measures other than respiratory protection implemented from Table 1-Specified Exposure Control Methods When Working with Materials Containing Crystalline Silica.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3972
More inspections at MG Construction Company
View MG Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348707019.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.