Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: MG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in DUSIT PLACE OFFICE ROOM RENOVATION SAN VITORES RD., TAMUNING, GU 96931 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 348707019.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MG Construction Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MG Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
DUSIT PLACE OFFICE ROOM RENOVATION SAN VITORES RD.
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96931
Mailing
139 KAYEN PUTION, DEDEDO, GU 96929
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,412 · Current $2,412
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about January 20, 2026 in the Dusit Place Hotel First floor office, an employee who was required to wear a 3M Particulate Respirator 9001, while using a chipping hammer to remove floor tiles was not fit tested prior to use.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2412

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. (Construction Reference 1926.103(a)):  On or about January 20, 2026 in the Dusit Place Hotel first floor office, an employee wearing a 3M Particulate Respirator 9001 while using a chipping hammer to remove floor tiles, was not medically cleared prior to use.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2026
Abate by
Apr 6, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  On or about January 20, 2026 in the Dusit Place Hotel First floor office, an employee was using a chipping hammer to remove floor tiles without any control measures other than respiratory protection implemented from Table 1-Specified Exposure Control Methods When Working with Materials Containing Crystalline Silica.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3972

View MG Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348707019.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.