Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: KUREK BROTHERS INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KUREK BROTHERS INC. in 3425 W. 111TH STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60655 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 338942824.

Watch Kurek Brothers INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kurek Brothers INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KUREK BROTHERS INC.
Site address
3425 W. 111TH STREET
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60655
Mailing
3425 W. 111TH STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60655
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Wiring type approved. Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined shall be of explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and shall otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations. Electrical wiring, motors, and other equipment outside of but within twenty (20) feet of any spraying area, and not separated therefrom by partitions, shall not produce sparks under normal operating conditions and shall otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part for Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Locations.     a. On or about March 07, 2013, inside the spray area, employees were required to perform spray finishing operations with paint, including but not limited to, ChromaBase Clears and ChromaSystem Binders that contained methyl ethyl ketone and toluene, flammable 1B liquids. Employees were required to spray finish within 6 feet of an electrical switch that did not conform to the provisions for Class I, Division 2, hazardous locations, thereby exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.107 C07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(7): Lamps. Electric lamps outside of, but within twenty (20) feet of any spraying area, and not separated therefrom by a partition, shall be totally enclosed to prevent the falling of hot particles and shall be protected from mechanical injury by suitable guards or by location.  a. On or about March 07, 2013, inside the spray area, employees were required to perform spray finishing operations with paint, including but not limited to, ChromaBase Clears and ChromaSystem Binders that contained methyl ethyl ketone and toluene, flammable 1B liquids.  Employees were required to spray finish within 6 feet of electrical lamps. The electrical lamps with florescent bulbs were not enclosed to prevent the falling of hot particles, thereby exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 G07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background shall be conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and paint storage rooms.  a. On or about March 07, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to spray finish and store paint including, but not limited to, ChromaBase Clears and ChromaSystem binders that contained methyl ethyl ketone and toluene, flammable 1B liquids. The employer did not post "no smoking" signs at the flammable storage room and spray area, thereby exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    a. On or about March 07, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees required to spray finish were exposed to hazards associated with chemicals such as, but not limited to, butyl acetate, methyl ethyl ketone, and acetone. The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) will be met.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.  a. On or about March 07, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees required to spray finish were exposed to hazards associated with chemicals such as, but not limited to, butyl acetate, methyl ethyl ketone, and acetone. These hazards necessitated the use of personal protective equipment such as safety glasses and gloves to prevent occupational injuries or illnesses. The employer had not verified, through written certification, that a hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).  a. On or about March 07, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees wore Moldex 8002 half mask respirators while spray finishing. The employees were not medically evaluated or trained. The employer did not provide the information in Appendix D to the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

VAFMC LLC

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338942824.