TURTLE LAKE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: WORLD FOOD PROCESSING
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WORLD FOOD PROCESSING in 105 SOUTH MAPLE STREET, TURTLE LAKE, WI 54889 (NAICS 311222). OSHA activity number 339528630.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WORLD FOOD PROCESSING
- Site address
- 105 SOUTH MAPLE STREET
- City
- TURTLE LAKE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54889
- Mailing
- 105 SOUTH MAPLE STREET, TURTLE LAKE, WI 54889
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311222
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not implement a noise monitoring program. Noise exposure levels were 98.5 to 108.3 dBA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not develop or maintain an audiometric testing program or conducted audiometric testing for employees exposed to noise levels above 85 dBA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1960.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146: (a) Throughout the facility; A confined space program was not implemented prior to entry of confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.146 C05 II C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(C): Employees entered into permit spaces that met the conditions set forth in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i) but before an employee entered the space, the internal atmosphere was not tested with a calibrated direct-reading instrument: (a) Throughout the facility; Atmospheric monitoring was not conducted prior to entering confined spaces. (b) Throughout the facility; Their four-gas meter was not calibrated prior to monitoring atmospheric conditions in confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: (a) Throughout the facility; Training for Confined Space Entry was not provided for each employee who entered confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 J04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(4): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor verified that rescue services were available and that the means for summoning them were operable: (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not verify that rescue services were available prior to each permit required space entry for spaces such as, but not limited to; i. Process tanks ii. Dryer bag house
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1960.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) Throughout the production area; Lockout procedures were not developed to isolate hazardous energy associated with equipment for the following operations: i. Jet cookers ii. Process Tanks iii. Dryer iv. Decanters centrifuge
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation: (a) Throughout the facility; Training was not conducted to inform authorized employees of the purpose of an energy control program, types of energy, and means for isolating hazardous sources of energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: (a) Rewet area; Energy isolation devices were not used during cleaning operations on feed augers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.147 F03 II D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment: (a) Throughout the facility; Lockout devices were not applied by each employee performing work on locked out equipment, such as, but not limited to; i. Electric motors, VFDs, and process piping for process tanks in the production area, # 5 and 9- Maintenance employees, ii. Hydraulic pumps, electric motors, VFD, natural gas supply line, and air supply line in the dryer area, iii. Decanters centrifuge drive motors and process piping in the wet process area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311222)
LOVELOCK, NV—2025-09-18
KS&P BUSINESSES, INC.
VASHON, WA—2022-11-01 00:00:00
WA317971246 - ISLAND SPRING INC
MARIETTA, PA—2020-08-05 00:00:00
PERDUE AGRIBUSINESS LLC
SAINT JOSEPH, MO—2020-02-24 00:00:00
AG PROCESSING, INC.
DELPHOS, OH—2019-11-08 00:00:00
BUNGE NORTH AMERICA (EAST), LLC
More inspections in WI
WAUSAU, WI—2026-07-16
MIRON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
ELROY, WI—2026-07-15
WABASH NATIONAL SERVICES, L.P.
SUSSEX, WI—2026-07-15
KINGS SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION LLC
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
TERONOMY BUILDERS, INC.
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
A. GOMEZ CARPENTRY, INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339528630.