Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WORLD FOOD PROCESSING

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WORLD FOOD PROCESSING in 105 SOUTH MAPLE STREET, TURTLE LAKE, WI 54889 (NAICS 311222). OSHA activity number 339528630.

Watch World Food Processing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for World Food Processing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
105 SOUTH MAPLE STREET
City
TURTLE LAKE
State
WI
ZIP
54889
Mailing
105 SOUTH MAPLE STREET, TURTLE LAKE, WI 54889
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311222
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:     (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not implement a noise monitoring program. Noise exposure levels were 98.5 to 108.3 dBA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:     (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not develop or maintain an audiometric testing program or conducted audiometric testing for employees exposed to noise levels above 85 dBA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:    (a) Throughout the facility; A confined space program was not implemented prior to entry of confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.146 C05 II C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(C): Employees entered into permit spaces that met the conditions set forth in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i) but before an employee entered the space, the internal atmosphere was not tested with a calibrated direct-reading instrument:    (a) Throughout the facility; Atmospheric monitoring was not conducted prior to entering confined spaces.       (b) Throughout the facility; Their four-gas meter was not calibrated prior to monitoring atmospheric conditions in confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146:    (a) Throughout the facility; Training for Confined Space Entry was not provided for each employee who entered confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 J04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(4): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor verified that rescue services were available and that the means for summoning them were operable:      (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not verify that rescue services were available prior to each permit required space entry for spaces such as, but not limited to;      i. Process tanks   ii. Dryer bag house
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a) Throughout the production area; Lockout procedures were not developed to isolate hazardous energy associated with equipment for the following operations:    i. Jet cookers     ii. Process Tanks      iii. Dryer        iv. Decanters centrifuge
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:    (a) Throughout the facility; Training was not conducted to inform authorized employees of the purpose of an energy control program, types of energy, and means for isolating hazardous sources of energy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:      (a) Rewet area; Energy isolation devices were not used during cleaning operations on feed augers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:      (a) Throughout the facility; Lockout devices were not applied by each employee performing work on locked out equipment, such as, but not limited to;       i. Electric motors, VFDs, and process piping for process tanks in the production area, # 5 and 9- Maintenance employees,      ii. Hydraulic pumps, electric motors, VFD, natural gas supply line, and air supply line in the dryer area,      iii. Decanters centrifuge drive motors and process piping in the wet process area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339528630.