SOMERSET, PA —
OSHA Inspection: GSP MARKETING INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GSP MARKETING INC. in 322 LAVANSVILLE ROAD, SOMERSET, PA 15501 (NAICS 336211). OSHA activity number 339598526.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GSP MARKETING INC.
- Site address
- 322 LAVANSVILLE ROAD
- City
- SOMERSET
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15501
- Mailing
- 322 LAVANSVILLE ROAD, SOMERSET, PA 15501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336211
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): A representative monitoring program was not developed and implemented when information indicated that an employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA: a) In the facility, on or about April 24, 2014 - The employer did not monitor noise exposure levels in the workplace to accurately identify employees' exposure to noise at or above 85 decibels (dB) averaged over eight working hours, or an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) In the facility, on or about April 24, 2014 - The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for employees designated as welders and exposed to continuous noise at 154.9%, 101.3%, and 100.8% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level for the exposures was 93.2, 90.1, and 90.1 dBA respectively.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a) In the facility, on or about April 24, 2014 - The employer did not train employees exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average level of 85 dBA in the effects of noise; the purposes, advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types of hearing protectors; the selection, fit, and care of various types of protectors; and the purposes and procedures of audiometric testing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 B05 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers: a) In the facility, on or about April 24, 2014 - The interior of the booth utilized for spray finishing was not protected by an automatic sprinkler or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $1260.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) In the facility, on or about February 21, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting half-mask respirators were provided a medical evaluation prior to the use of the respirator in the workplace. b) In the facility, on or about February 21, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting supplied-air respirators were provided a medical evaluation prior to the use of the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter: a) In the facility, on or about February 21, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting half-mask respirators were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator in the workplace. b) In the facility, on or about February 21, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting supplied air respirators were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator in the workplace and at least annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 L01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1): The employer did not make available to affected employees or their representatives copies of 29 CFR 1910.95 and did not post a copy in the workplace: a) In the facility, on or about April 24, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that a copy of 29 CFR 1910.95 was made available to all affected employees or posted in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) In the facility, on or about February 21, 2014 - The employer's written hazard communication program did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by the employer; the safety data sheet; including the order of information and how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information in accordance with HazCom 2012.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at GSP MARKETING INC.
SOMERSET, PA—2018-12-18 00:00:00
GSP MARKETING INC.
SOMERSET, PA—2018-04-16 00:00:00
GSP MARKETING, INC.
SOMERSET, PA—2016-10-20 00:00:00
GSP MARKETING INC.
SOMERSET, PA—2014-02-20 00:00:00
GSP MARKETING INC.
View GSP MARKETING INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336211)
MOORESVILLE, IN—2026-07-10
TOA USA LLC
PAINESVILLE, OH—2026-06-26
GRAND-ROCK COMPANY INC.
DODGE CENTER, MN—2026-06-25
111482 - CON-TECH MANUFACTURING INC
NORWAY, MI—2026-06-23
LOADMASTER CORPORATION
FRANKLIN, KY—2026-06-18
69236 - FRANKLIN PRECISION INDUSTRY INCORPORRATED
More inspections in PA
MILTON, PA—2026-07-10
HOMETOWN FOODS CHEF BOYARDEE CO.
SUNBURY, PA—2026-07-10
DEMPSEY UNIFORM & LINEN SUPPLY, INC
LANDISVILLE, PA—2026-07-10
FAIRVIEW DEMOLITION LLC
YORK, PA—2026-07-10
AMERICAN SPECIALTY SYSTEMS INC.
WILLIAMSPORT, PA—2026-07-10
INTERNATIONAL PAINT PROS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339598526.