Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: FOX TANK COMPANY

Follow-up inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of FOX TANK COMPANY in 117 AIRPORT COMMERCE PARKWAY, KERRVILLE, TX 78028 (NAICS 237120). OSHA activity number 339635674.

Watch FOX Tank Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FOX Tank Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FOX TANK COMPANY
Site address
117 AIRPORT COMMERCE PARKWAY
City
KERRVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78028
Mailing
117 AIRPORT COMMERCE PARKWAY, KERRVILLE, TX 78028
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237120
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    a)  A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 171.9% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 484 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 93.9 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 4 minutes of additional sampling.    b) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 158.6% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 483 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 93.3 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 3 minutes of additional sampling.   c) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 104.3% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 483 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.3 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 3 minutes of additional sampling.   d) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 87.4% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 476 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.0 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 4 minutes not sampled.  e)  A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 86.6% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 483 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 88.9 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 3 minutes of additional sampling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, airborne exposures were not evaluated for employees who were required and voluntarily wear tight-fitting respirators such as, but not limited to, Miller LPR-100 half facepiece respirators with P100 filter cartridges while welding the interior and exterior of steel tanks being manufactured for the oil and gas industry.  Employees were exposed to potential oxygen deficient atmospheres/or inhalation of toxic welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace;  On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees who were required and voluntarily wear tight fitting respirators such as, but not limited to, Miller LPR-100 half facepiece respirators with P100 filter cartridges while welding the interior and exterior of steel tanks being manufactured for the oil and gas industry.  Employees were exposed to potential oxygen deficient atmospheres/or inhalation of toxic welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide respirator fit testing for employees who were required or voluntarily wear tight tight-fitting respirators such as, but not limited to, Miller LPR-100 half facepiece respirators with P100 filter cartridges while welding the interior and exterior of steel tanks being manufactured for the oil and gas industry.  Employees were exposed to potential oxygen deficient atmospheres/or inhalation of toxic welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  On or about March 13, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators had a beard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate goggles, to protect them from the rays when noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields were not used:    On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, welding areas were not shielded or otherwise screened off to protect adjacent workers from viewing the welding arc and exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.252 B04 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(4)(iv): Where the welder must enter a confined space through a manhole or other small opening, means was not provided for quickly removing the welder in case of emergency:  On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees performed confined space entry into steel tanks to do welding operations.  The employer did not provide a non-entry retrieval system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.254 D09 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced:    On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that arc welding cables were free from damage to the insulation, exposing employees to the hazard of heated conductors and electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.303 B07 IV

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): There were damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of electric equipment, such as parts that were broken, bent, cut or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating:    On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the flexible cords in the facility had damage to the insulation that affected the safety of the cords, exposing employees to electric shock and arc/fire hazards.    a) A yellow extension cord powering an 110 volt angle grinder had exposed copper wiring damage to the internal insulation.    Fox Tank Company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 892898, Citation number 1, Item number 7 and was affirmed as a final order on 7/12/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 104 Highway 87, Comfort, TX 78013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $1000
  • — Z (R) $4200

1910.305 G02 III

Deleted Repeat Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the flexible cords in the facility showed signs of strain relief issues, exposing employees to the hazards of electric shock.  a)  An orange extension cord connected to a receptacle box labeled LA-9 that powered a 110 volt portable grinder had exposed wiring.  b)  A yellow extension cord connected to a receptacle box labeled LA-9 that powered a 110 volt portable grinder had exposed wiring.  Fox Tank Company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 892898, Citation number 1, Item number 10d and was affirmed as a final order on 7/12/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 104 Highway 87, Comfort, TX 78013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $4200

View FOX TANK COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339635674.