KERRVILLE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FOX TANK COMPANY
Follow-up inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of FOX TANK COMPANY in 117 AIRPORT COMMERCE PARKWAY, KERRVILLE, TX 78028 (NAICS 237120). OSHA activity number 339635674.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FOX TANK COMPANY
- Site address
- 117 AIRPORT COMMERCE PARKWAY
- City
- KERRVILLE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78028
- Mailing
- 117 AIRPORT COMMERCE PARKWAY, KERRVILLE, TX 78028
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237120
- Employees
- 21
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 171.9% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 484 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 93.9 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 4 minutes of additional sampling. b) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 158.6% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 483 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 93.3 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 3 minutes of additional sampling. c) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 104.3% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 483 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.3 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 3 minutes of additional sampling. d) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 87.4% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 476 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.0 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 4 minutes not sampled. e) A welder was exposed to continuous noise at 86.6% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weight Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 483 minute sampling period on May 13, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 88.9 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero calculation increment for the 3 minutes of additional sampling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, airborne exposures were not evaluated for employees who were required and voluntarily wear tight-fitting respirators such as, but not limited to, Miller LPR-100 half facepiece respirators with P100 filter cartridges while welding the interior and exterior of steel tanks being manufactured for the oil and gas industry. Employees were exposed to potential oxygen deficient atmospheres/or inhalation of toxic welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace; On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees who were required and voluntarily wear tight fitting respirators such as, but not limited to, Miller LPR-100 half facepiece respirators with P100 filter cartridges while welding the interior and exterior of steel tanks being manufactured for the oil and gas industry. Employees were exposed to potential oxygen deficient atmospheres/or inhalation of toxic welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide respirator fit testing for employees who were required or voluntarily wear tight tight-fitting respirators such as, but not limited to, Miller LPR-100 half facepiece respirators with P100 filter cartridges while welding the interior and exterior of steel tanks being manufactured for the oil and gas industry. Employees were exposed to potential oxygen deficient atmospheres/or inhalation of toxic welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: On or about March 13, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators had a beard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate goggles, to protect them from the rays when noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields were not used: On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, welding areas were not shielded or otherwise screened off to protect adjacent workers from viewing the welding arc and exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.252 B04 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(4)(iv): Where the welder must enter a confined space through a manhole or other small opening, means was not provided for quickly removing the welder in case of emergency: On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees performed confined space entry into steel tanks to do welding operations. The employer did not provide a non-entry retrieval system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.254 D09 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced: On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that arc welding cables were free from damage to the insulation, exposing employees to the hazard of heated conductors and electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.303 B07 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): There were damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of electric equipment, such as parts that were broken, bent, cut or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating: On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the flexible cords in the facility had damage to the insulation that affected the safety of the cords, exposing employees to electric shock and arc/fire hazards. a) A yellow extension cord powering an 110 volt angle grinder had exposed copper wiring damage to the internal insulation. Fox Tank Company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 892898, Citation number 1, Item number 7 and was affirmed as a final order on 7/12/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 104 Highway 87, Comfort, TX 78013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $1000
- — Z (R) $4200
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about March 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the flexible cords in the facility showed signs of strain relief issues, exposing employees to the hazards of electric shock. a) An orange extension cord connected to a receptacle box labeled LA-9 that powered a 110 volt portable grinder had exposed wiring. b) A yellow extension cord connected to a receptacle box labeled LA-9 that powered a 110 volt portable grinder had exposed wiring. Fox Tank Company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 892898, Citation number 1, Item number 10d and was affirmed as a final order on 7/12/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 104 Highway 87, Comfort, TX 78013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $4200
More inspections at FOX TANK COMPANY
ALBANY, TX—2022-08-11 00:00:00
FOX TANK COMPANY
ALBANY, TX—2022-08-11 00:00:00
FOX TANK COMPANY
KERRVILLE, TX—2018-10-22 00:00:00
FOX TANK COMPANY
KERRVILLE, TX—2017-03-30 00:00:00
FOX TANK COMPANY
KERRVILLE, TX—2017-03-30 00:00:00
FOX TANK COMPANY
View FOX TANK COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237120)
ARCADIA, FL—2026-07-14
M. G. DYESS, LLC
ODEM, TX—2026-07-09
MPG PIPELINE CONTRACTORS, LLC
FREMONT, MI—2026-07-07
ROESE PIPELINE COMPANY, INC.
BROOK PARK, OH—2026-06-30
MICHELS FOUNDATIONS - FRANKSVILLE, A DIVISION OF MICHELS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
HAZLE TOWNSHIP, PA—2026-06-24
LINDE CORPORATION
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339635674.