Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARVEL INDUSTRIAL COATINGS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MARVEL INDUSTRIAL COATINGS in 6309 SKYLINE DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77057 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 339754095.

Watch Marvel Industrial Coatings — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marvel Industrial Coatings is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6309 SKYLINE DRIVE
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77057
Mailing
6309 SKYLINE DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77057
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424690
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The spraying operations were not designed, installed and maintained that the average air velocity over the open face of the booth (or booth cross section during spraying operations) was greater than 100 linear feet per minute. Visible gauges or audible alarm or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or ensure that the required air velocity is maintained:  a) in the facility spray booth, a cross section of the air flow was 25 linear feet per minute and no visible gauges, audible alarm or pressure activated devices to indicate or ensure the required velocity was maintained were installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:  a) the facility spray booth, the spray booth was not protected with sprinklers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 D09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(9): Air exhaust from spray operations was directed so that it will contaminate makeup air being introduced into the spraying area and other ventilating intakes, nor directed so as to create a nuisance. Air exhausted from spray operations was recirculated:  a) at the facility spray booth, the make-up air from the air conditioner is in close proximity to the exhaust fan causing recirculation of contaminated air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) at the facility, where employees use a 3M 6800, full-face respirator with 3M5 6006 multi-gas cartridge when spraying the company product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) at the facility, where employees use a 3M 6800, full-face respirator with 3M5 6006 multi-gas cartridge when spraying the company product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) at the facility, where employees use a 3M 6800, full-face respirator with 3M5 6006 multi-gas cartridge when spraying the company product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a) at the facility, employees had not received training to operate the Nissan 30 Enduro.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9965

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) at the facility, the company did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program where the employees use M91 Resin and M391 - iso which contains methylene bisphenyl isocyanate to produce a product, Elastocoat R393A90M.  Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate is a sensitizer which produces asthma like symptoms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339754095.