Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EZZI SIGNS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EZZI SIGNS, INC. in N. EARL RUDDER FWY, BRYAN, TX 77802 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 339820557.

Watch Ezzi Signs, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ezzi Signs, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EZZI SIGNS, INC.
Site address
N. EARL RUDDER FWY
City
BRYAN
State
TX
ZIP
77802
Mailing
21807 MCCAMEY DR., CYPRESS, TX 77429
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.150 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.150(a)(4): All firefighting equipment was not inspected and maintained in operating condition.  On or about June 24, 2014, employees were installing material on the restaurant under construction using a truck crane without the employer ensuring that the fire extinguisher on the Wilkie truck crane was inspected and in operating condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1417 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(c)(1): The procedures applicable to the operation of the equipment, including rated capacities (load charts), recommended operating speeds, special hazard warnings, instructions, and operator's manual, were not readily available in the cab at all times for use by the operator.   On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not ensure the operators manual or operation procedures were readily available with the crane for use by the operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1425 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1425(b)(1): While the operator is not moving a suspended load, an employee not engaged in one of the activities described in subsection (b)(1), (b)(2), or (b)(3) was within the fall zone of the load.   On or about June 24, 2014, an employee was preparing the electrical connections to the drive through roof while standing directly under the suspended load, exposing the employee to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1430 D

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1430(d): The employer did not train each competent person and each qualified person regarding the requirements of this subpart applicable to their respective roles.  On or about June 24, 2014, the employer failed to train each employee who is involved in crane operations. The training shall include the following topics, but not limited to: a) Each employee to keep clear of holes, and crush/pinch points and swing radius hazards. b) Fall hazards while on, or hoisted by, equipment covered by this subpart. c) The design criteria, maximum intended load-carrying capacity. d) The manufactures emergency procedures for halting unintended equipment movement. e) Tagout and start up procedures.  f) Overhead powerlines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1433 D04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1433(d)(4)(iii): The latch did not close the throat opening on the so that it would retain slings or other lifting devices/accessories in the hook when the rigging apparatus is slack.  On or about, June 24, 2014, while installing the drive thru roof to the restaurant using a truck crane, a knot was made in the synthetic web sling. The safety latch was blocked and inoperable, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1412 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1412(d)(1): Visual inspections were not performed by a competent person prior to each shift for apparent deficiencies of the equipment that was used:  On or about June 24, 2014, visual inspections were not conducted by a competent person prior to the shift starting, exposing employees to the hazards associated their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1412 E03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1412(e)(3)(i): The employer did not document and maintain the results of the monthly inspection including the items checked along with the date and signature of the person performing the inspection.  On or about June 24, 2014, a truck crane was operated without the employer ensuring that monthly inspections were conducted by a competent person, exposing employees to the hazards associated their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1412 F07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(7): The employer did not document, maintain, or retain for a minimum of 12 months the crane items checked, the results of the inspection, the name and signature of the person conducting the inspection, and the date of the inspection.  On or about June 24, 2014, a truck crane was operated without the employer ensuring that annual inspections were conducted by a competent person, exposing employees to the hazards associated their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1413 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1413(a)(1): A competent person did not begin a wire rope visual inspection prior to each shift the equipment is used and/or did not complete the visual inspection before or during that shift.  On or about June 24, 2014, a truck crane was operated without the employer ensuring that a wire rope visual inspection was conducted by a competent person prior to the shift starting, exposing employees to the hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1413 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1413(b)(1): Each month a wire rope inspection must be conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) (shift inspection) of this section and documented according to paragraph (b)(4) of this section.  On or about June 24, 2014, a truck crane was operated without the employer ensuring that monthly inspections were conducted by a competent person, exposing employees to the hazards associated their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1413 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1413(c)(1): At least every 12 months, wire ropes in use on equipment were not inspected by a qualified person in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section (shift inspection) and documented according to (c)(4) of this section.  On or about June 24, 2014, a truck crane was operated without the employer ensuring that wire rope annual inspections were conducted by a competent person, exposing employees to the hazards associated their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View EZZI SIGNS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339820557.