Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ENVIRONMENTAL TANK AND CONTAINER

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ENVIRONMENTAL TANK AND CONTAINER in 163 CRAMER PIKE, JOHNSTOWN, PA 15906 (NAICS 332420). OSHA activity number 339836835.

Watch Environmental Tank AND Container — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Environmental Tank AND Container is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
163 CRAMER PIKE
City
JOHNSTOWN
State
PA
ZIP
15906
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1286, JOHNSTOWN, PA 15907
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332420
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.94 A02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 15209130

29 CFR 1910.94(a)(2)(ii): The concentration of respirable dust or fume in the breathing zone of the abrasive-blasting operator or any other worker was not kept below the levels specified in 1910.1000:  a) At the facility, on or about July 9, 2014 - The concentration of particulates not otherwise regulated (respirable fraction) in the breathing zone of the Blastman while abrasive blasting the inside and outside of a steel mud tank was 20.5452 mg/m3 as a time weighted average.  This level is 4.1 times the permissible exposure limit of 5 mg/m3 specified in 1910.1000 for respirable dust as a time weighted average concentration.  Sampling was performed by an OSHA compliance officer on 7/9/14 for 158 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the shift.  b) At the facility, on or about July 9, 2014 - The concentration of iron oxide fume in the breathing zone of the Blastman while abrasive blasting the inside and outside of a steel mud tank was 15.9978 mg/m3 as a time weighted average.  This level is 1.6 times the permissible exposure limit of 10 mg/m3 specified in 1910.1000 for iron oxide fume as a time weighted average concentration.  Sampling was performed by an OSHA compliance officer on 7/9/14 for 158 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.94 A05 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.94(a)(5)(iv): For employees who use respirators required by this section, the employer must implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134.  a) At the facility, on or about July 3, 2014 - Employees are required to wear a supplied air respirator, a NOVA 2000 blast helmet, while blasting mud tanks in the Hoffman II Blast Booth with Amabrasive.  The employer's written respiratory protection program did not contain procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air.  b) At the facility, on or about July 3, 2014 - Employees required to wear the NOVA 2000 blast helmet while blasting mud tanks with Amabrasive did not receive a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 15209130

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  a) At the facility, on or about July 9, 2014 - The employer did not implement feasible administrative controls or engineering controls while the Blastman was abrasively blasting inside a steel mud tank to achieve compliance with the particulates not otherwise regulated (respirable fraction) permissible exposure limit.  An employee was exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated (respirable fraction) above the permissible exposure limit.  (See description of employee exposure in Citation 1 item 1a).  b) At the facility, on or about July 9, 2014 - The employer did not implement feasible administrative controls or engineering controls while the Blastman was abrasively blasting inside a steel mud tank to achieve compliance with the iron oxide fume permissible exposure limit.  An employee was exposed to iron oxide fume above the permissible exposure limit.  (See description of employee exposure in Citation 1, Item 1a).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.244 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.244(b): No support(s) for the abrasive blast cleaning nozzle(s) were provided for mounting the nozzle when not in use:  a) At the facility, on or about July 3, 2014 - In the Hoffman II blast both, supports were not installed to mount nozzles used to abrasive blast steel mud tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View ENVIRONMENTAL TANK AND CONTAINER's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339836835.