Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ in 7194 SEYMOUR COURT, CANAL WNCHSTR, OH 43110 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340128958.

Watch Guadalupe Hernandez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Guadalupe Hernandez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ
Site address
7194 SEYMOUR COURT
City
CANAL WNCHSTR
State
OH
ZIP
43110
Mailing
4715 SULLIVANT AVENUE LOT 2A, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds shall be designed by a qualified person and shall be constructed and loaded in accordance with that design. Non-mandatory Appendix A to this subpart contains examples of criteria that will enable an employer to comply with paragraph (a) of this section.     a. Located at Lot 628 at 7194 Seymour Court in Canal Winchester, Ohio, employees were performing siding work from an unleveled pump jack scaffold, exposing employees to an approximately 12 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles shall be secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. When the pump jack has to pass bracing already installed, an additional brace shall be installed approximately 4 feet (1.2 m) above the brace to be passed, and shall be left in place until the pump jack has been moved and the original brace reinstalled.   a. Located at Lot 628 at 7194 Seymour Court in Canal Winchester, Ohio, employees were performing siding work from a pump jack scaffold. The scaffold support poles were unsecured on the bottom side, exposing employees to an approximately 12 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1120.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers.  Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs, and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part.     a. Located at Lot 628 at 7194 Seymour Court in Canal Winchester, Ohio, employees were performing siding work from a pump jack scaffold without fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. Located at Lot 628 at 7194 Seymour Court in Canal Winchester, Ohio, employees were performing siding work from the roof of a residential home without fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 foot.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340128958.