Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: L S PACKAGING DESIGN, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of L S PACKAGING DESIGN, INC. in 6504 MAYFAIR ST., HOUSTON, TX 77087 (NAICS 333515). OSHA activity number 340133016.

Watch L S Packaging Design, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for L S Packaging Design, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6504 MAYFAIR ST.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77087
Mailing
6504 MAYFAIR ST., HOUSTON, TX 77087
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333515
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a) At the facility, where the employer had not implemented a hearing conservation program.  An employee polishing stainless pieces was exposed to 67.2% of the noise dose which is equivalent to approximately 87.1 dBA.  Sampling was conducted for 404 minutes during one shift on December 23, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 76 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by rotating parts, ingoing nip points, and/or point of operation hazards:  a) In the Machine Shop, where the chuck on the Victor high precision lathe was not guarded which exposed employees to rotating parts.  b) In the Fabrication Area, where the Chicago press brake, model HPB6026, serial 330271 was not guarded which exposed employees to ingoing nip points and point of operation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  a) At the facility, where the employer did not certify that the operator had been trained to operate the Toyota forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  a) At the facility, where the employer had not evaluated the hazards of hexavalent chromium during the polishing and welding processes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340133016.