Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JAR DESIGN CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAR DESIGN CONSTRUCTION in NEW 2 STORY APARTMENT AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING BEACH ROAD AND DOTSE PLACE, VILLAGE OF I-LIYANG, SAIPAN, MP 96950 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 340522218.

Watch JAR Design Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JAR Design Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
NEW 2 STORY APARTMENT AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING BEACH ROAD AND DOTSE PLACE, VILLAGE OF I-LIYANG
City
SAIPAN
State
MP
ZIP
96950
Mailing
PO BOX 504249 CK, SAIPAN, MP 96950
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $714.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors:    In the parking lot at the back of the building, there were no ground fault circuit interrupters or assured equipment grounding conductor program to protect employees that used 110 VAC concrete mixer.  No identification plate was visible.  Employees that used the concrete mixer to mix water with cement were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    (a.) In the parking lot at the back of the building, there was no grounding continuity between the grounding pin on the plug of a flexible cord and the grounding screw in the control box for a 110 VAC concrete mixer.  No identification plate was visible.  Employees that used the concrete mixer to mix water with cement were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.  (b.) In the parking lot at the back of the building, there was no grounding pin on the extension cord that provided power to a 110 VAC concrete mixer.  No identification plate was visible.  Employees that used the concrete mixer to mix water with cement were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $714.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not being protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On the exterior backside of the building, there was no fall protection for about 20 feet along an 80 foot long exterior walkway.  Employees that used the walkway to access the second level interior were exposed to the hazard of falling from a height of about 11 feet to the concrete below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1926.502 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structural members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high:     On the exterior backside of the building, there was no midrail or equivalent in the guardrail system for about 40 feet along an 80 foot long exterior walkway.  Employees that used the walkway to access the second level interior were exposed to the hazard of falling from a height of about 11 feet to the concrete below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $714.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:    On the exterior backside of the building, there were no stairrail systems along the unprotected sides of the stairways that led to the second level.  There were 8 risers to a 5.5 foot high landing and 8 risers to the 11 foot high second level.  Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling from heights that varied up to 11 feet to the concrete below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1926.1052 C12

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems:     On the exterior backside of the building, there were no guardrail systems on stairway landing for the stairway that led to the second level.  The landing was 10 feet long by 5 feet wide.  Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling from a height of about 5.5 feet to the concrete below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340522218.