OSHA Inspection: CHESTER HARRIS

Issued

2015-10-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-11-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $440.00 · Current $440.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On July 10, 2015, Chester Harris dba Chester Harris Construction was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:          Citation 1 Item 1

Issued

2015-10-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-11-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $440.00 · Current $440.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  On July 24, 2015, , JRC, LLC was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:      a.    Citation 1 Item 2a & b and,  b.    Citation 1 Item 3.

Issued

2015-07-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2200.00 · Current $2200.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    An employee engaged in residential activities was exposed to a struck by hazard in the eye, while using a pneumatic nail gun on a construction site in Peoria, IL, and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.

Issued

2015-07-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3080.00 · Current $3080.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.    An employees engaged in residential activities was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 25ft. along the rake edge of the roof, on a construction site in Peoria, IL, and the employer did not ensure  employees were tied off.

Issued

2015-07-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):  The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:     The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.

Issued

2015-07-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2200.00 · Current $2200.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows:      Employees engaged in residential activities were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Peoria, IL, and the employer did not ensure each employee was using an anchor that is able to support at least 5,000 pounds.  Two employees were anchored to one anchor, which did not meet the requirements for personal fall arrest protection.