Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MATSCHE FARMS INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of MATSCHE FARMS INC. in N9035 RIVER ROAD, BIRNAMWOOD, WI 54414 (NAICS 112120). OSHA activity number 340853118.

Watch Matsche Farms INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Matsche Farms INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MATSCHE FARMS INC.
Site address
N9035 RIVER ROAD
City
BIRNAMWOOD
State
WI
ZIP
54414
Mailing
N9035 RIVER ROAD, BIRNAMWOOD, WI 54414
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
112120
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 33 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to hazardous corrosive chemicals:    (a)  On or about August 17, 2015 in the milking parlor, employees were exposed to severe burn hazards to their eyes and face when they transferred and used Tru-Blu Parlor Brite into open buckets to clean and sanitize the floors and walls without wearing any appropriate eye or face protection.      (b) On or about August 17, 2015 in the milking parlor, employees were exposed to severe burn hazards to their eyes and face when they utilized high pressure spray to rinse down the floors and walls after applying Tru-Blu Parlor Brite without wearing any appropriate eye or face protection.      (c)  On or about August 17, 2015 in the maternity barn, employees were exposed to severe burn hazards to their eyes and face when they transferred Hoof Effects Foot Solutions Foot Bath concentrate to the maternity pen foot baths via a five gallon bucket without wearing any appropriate eye or face protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $4900

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to atmospheric hazards:  (a)  On or about August 14, 2015, an employee was asphyxiated while exposed to atmospheric hazard when working in an 8000 gallon polyethylene whey tank in an attempt to open a ball valve.  The employee entered the partially filled whey tank without quantifying and eliminating atmospheric hazards.   (b)  On or about July 20, 2015, employees entered an approximately ten foot deep manure reception pit located at the west end of the free stall barns to manually remove manure solids without quantifying and eliminating atmospheric hazards.    (c)  On or about July 20, 2015, employees entered an approximately nine foot deep manure reception pit located in the separator room to manually remove manure solids without quantifying and eliminating atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 33 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5))    The employer did not develop, and implement a written hazard communication program addressing employee training, chemical labeling and maintenance of safety data sheets when working with hazardous chemicals such as Tru-Blu Parlor Brite, OxySans, and Hoof Effects Foot Solutions among others in the milking parlor, and maternity barn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section:  The employer did not ensure that diesel fuel in a parts washer located in the maintenance shop was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and hazards of its contents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 33 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:   The employer did not maintain safety data sheets in the workplace for the hazardous chemicals they used such as Tru-Blu Parlor Brite, OxySans, and Hoof Effects Foot Solutions among others in the milking parlor, maternity barn, and maintenance shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 33 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5))  The employer did not train employees on the hazardous chemicals they used such as Tru-Blu Parlor Brite, OxySans, and Hoof Effects Foot Solutions among others in the milking parlor, maternity barn, and maintenance shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1928.51 B02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 33 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1928.51(b)(2)(i)(A): Where ROPS were required by this section, the employer did not provide each tractor with a seatbelt which meets the requirements of this paragraph:    The employer permitted employees to operate a JCB Telehandler (S/N SLP506C05E0588702) that had the seatbelt unbolted and removed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1928.57 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 33 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1928.57(a)(6): At the time of initial assignment, and at least annually thereafter, the employer did not instruct every employee in the safe operation and servicing of all covered equipment with which he was or would be involved:    The employer did not train employees in the safe operation and servicing of farmstead and farm field equipment including the requirements to disconnect power sources, lockout out electrical power, ensure everyone is clear of machinery, and ensure guards are in place when operating equipment throughout the farm.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1928.57 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1928.57(c)(2)(i): The mesh or nip-points of all power driven gears, belts, chains, sheaves, pulleys, sprockets, and idlers were not guarded:    (a)  On or about August 17, 2015, two rotating gates located in the milking parlor did not have their power driven chains and sprockets guarded.    (b)  On or about September 2, 2015, a calf feed auger located in calf barn #1 had a broken cover exposing employees to the power driven belt and pulleys.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 3 instances 33 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $700.00 · Current $700.00
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent.   Located at Matsche Farms, Inc. N9035 River Rd. Birnamwood, WI 54414: On or about August 17, 2015, the employer did not record the following workplace injuries and illnesses on the OSHA 300 Log for calendar year 2015.  (a)  On or about August 14, 2015, an employee asphyxiated while working in a liquid whey tank.  (b)  On or about August 10, 2015, an employee received a contusion requiring medical treatment on the left foot.  (c)  On or about July 25, 2015, an employee was kicked in the right elbow causing trauma to the right elbow and upper arm requiring medical treatment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $700
  • — Z (O) $700

1928.51 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 33 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1928.51(d): Every employee who operates an agricultural tractor was not informed of operating practices contained in Appendix A of this part and of any other practices dictated by the work environment.  Employees who operated agricultural tractors were not provided initial and annual training on safe operating practices when performing field work, feeding and cleaning, manure handling, and horizontal bunker silo compaction among others job tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340853118.