Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MFB CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MFB CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 319 WASHINGTON STREET, PEEKSKILL, NY 10566 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340902865.

Watch MFB Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MFB Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
319 WASHINGTON STREET
City
PEEKSKILL
State
NY
ZIP
10566
Mailing
138 CITY ISLAND AVE., BRONX, NY 10464
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street  a) The employees were not provided training as required by the standard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street  a) The two employees working below scaffold/roof were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:  On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street  a) The employees were working on two different roofs which were 11'4" and 13' high. They were not protected from falling off the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340902865.