PEEKSKILL, NY —
OSHA Inspection: MFB CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MFB CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 319 WASHINGTON STREET, PEEKSKILL, NY 10566 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340902865.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MFB CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 319 WASHINGTON STREET
- City
- PEEKSKILL
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10566
- Mailing
- 138 CITY ISLAND AVE., BRONX, NY 10464
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street a) The employees were not provided training as required by the standard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street a) The two employees working below scaffold/roof were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street a) The employees were working on two different roofs which were 11'4" and 13' high. They were not protected from falling off the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16 00:00:00
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16 00:00:00
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15 00:00:00
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in NY
MAYVILLE, NY—2026-07-16 00:00:00
MAYVILLE VILLAGE DPW
NEW HYDE PARK, NY—2026-07-16 00:00:00
NORTH HEMPSTEAD TN MICHAEL J TULLY PARK
CONESUS, NY—2026-07-16 00:00:00
CONESUS TN HIGHWAY DEPT
COMSTOCK, NY—2026-07-15 00:00:00
NYSDOCCS WASHINGTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
BALDWINSVILLE, NY—2026-07-15 00:00:00
LYSANDER TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340902865.