1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: RIO GRANDE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RIO GRANDE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. in 778 E. US HWY 90, BRACKETTVILLE, TX 78832 (NAICS 221122). OSHA activity number 340951854.

Watch RIO Grande Electric Cooperative, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RIO Grande Electric Cooperative, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
778 E. US HWY 90
City
BRACKETTVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78832
Mailing
778 E. US HWY 90, BRACKETTVILLE, TX 78832
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
221122
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.269 C01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.269(c)(1)(i): In assigning an employee or a group of employees to perform a job, the employer did not provide the employee in charge of the job with all available information that relates to the determination of existing characteristics and conditions.  Remote site: On or about September 28, 2015, the employer did not ensure that the employee in charge of the job had all available information relating to the determination of existing characteristics and conditions of energized equipment. This condition exposed employee(s) to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.269 D02 IV B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.269(d)(2)(iv)(B): Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy were not developed and used:    Remote site: On or about September 28, 2015, the employer did not ensure that specific procedures for shutting down, isolating, or blocking hazardous energy were developed and used. This condition exposed employee(s) to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $5000
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.269 D02 IV C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.269(d)(2)(iv)(C): Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal, and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them:    Remote site: On or about September 28, 2015, the employer did not ensure that specific procedural steps were taken for the placement, removal, and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices. This condition exposed employee(s) to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.269 D02 IV D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.269(d)(2)(iv)(D): Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures were not conducted:    Remote site: On or about September 28, 2015, the employer did not ensure that specific testing requirements were used to confirm the effectiveness of the lock out device used to de-energize the meter box. This condition exposed employee(s) to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 E02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(e)(2): The marking was not of sufficient durability to withstand the environment involved.  Remote site: On about September 28, 2015, the employer did not ensure that the marking on meter box where arc flash occurred was legible. This condition exposed employee(s) to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.333 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): While the employee is exposed to contact with live parts of fixed electrical equipment or circuits which have been de-energized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged out or both in accordance with the requirement in this paragraph:  Remote site: On or about September 30, 2015, the employer did not ensure that meter box was de-energized before replacing the meter and cleaning contacts. This condition exposed employee(s) to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.333 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(2): The employer did not ensure that only qualified persons were working on energized circuits and that qualified persons were familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment, insulating and shielding materials, and insulated tools:  Remote site: On or about September 28, 2015, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) working on energized equipment were qualified and familiar with precautionary techniques. This condition exposed employee(s) to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(ii): Protective shields, protective barriers, or insulating materials were not used to protect each employee from shock, burns, or other electrically related injuries while that employee was working near exposed energized parts which might be accidentally contacted or where dangerous electric heating or arcing might occur:  Remote site: On or about September 28, 2015, the employer did not ensure that protective shields, protective barriers, or insulating materials were used to protect each employee from shock, burns, or other electrically related injuries while that employee was working near exposed energized parts.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

View RIO GRANDE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

PSE&G

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340951854.