COAHOMA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: WTG GAS PROCESSING, LP EAST VEALMOOR PLANT
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of WTG GAS PROCESSING, LP EAST VEALMOOR PLANT in 11703 E. FM 846, COAHOMA, TX 79511 (NAICS 213111). OSHA activity number 341034361.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WTG GAS PROCESSING, LP EAST VEALMOOR PLANT
- Site address
- 11703 E. FM 846
- City
- COAHOMA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79511
- Mailing
- 211 N. COLORADO, MIDLAND, TX 79701
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213111
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 E06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $6700.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(6): The process hazard analysis was not updated and revalidated every five years: On or about November 1, 2015, the employer had not updated and revalidated the process hazard analysis every five years as required. The last process hazard analysis was conducted in 2000.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $6700
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 F01 I C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $6700.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(C): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting temporary operations. On or about November1, 2015, employer did not establish and implement temporary operating procedures when the flare is inoperable.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $6700
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 F01 I E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $6700.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(E): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and did not address at least emergency operations. On or about November 1, 2015, the employer did not establish and implement written emergency operating procedures when the emergency flare is inoperable for an extended period of time.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $6700
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 F04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(4): The employer did not develop and implement safe work practices to provide for the control of hazards during operations such as lockout/tagout; confined space entry; opening process equipment or piping; and control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel: On or about November 1, 2015, the employer did not develop safe work practices to control ignition sources in the emergency flare area.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 J05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information on paragraph (d) of this section) in a safe and timely manner when necessary means where taken to assure safe operation: On or about November 1, 2015, the employer did not ensure deficiencies in the emergency flare outside acceptable limit was corrected in a safe and timely manner.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: On or about November 1, 2015, the employer did not ensure employee(s) wore personal protective equipment such as a fire retardant shirts while re-igniting the flare.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213111)
JAL, NM—2026-07-01 00:00:00
HELMERICH & PAYNE, IDC
LAREDO, TX—2026-06-29 00:00:00
AXIS ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
MCALESTER, OK—2026-06-18 00:00:00
SANGUINE GAS EXPLORATION, LLC
MOUNT PLEASANT, MI—2026-06-15 00:00:00
BIGARD & HUGGARD DRILLING INC
MOUNT PLEASANT, MI—2026-06-15 00:00:00
BIGARD & HUGGARD DRILLING INC
More inspections in TX
RICHMOND, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
CORNELIUS NURSERIES, INC.
HOUSTON, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
HOLLOWAY HOUSTON, INC.
BONHAM, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
VOLUNTARY PURCHASING GROUPS, INC.
SNYDER, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
RNWBL
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341034361.