METAIRIE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: ERIC MAYER
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ERIC MAYER in 306 MAPLE RIDGE, METAIRIE, LA 70001 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341168284.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ERIC MAYER
- Site address
- 306 MAPLE RIDGE
- City
- METAIRIE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70001
- Mailing
- 2036 N. RIVER PARK DRIVE, VIOLET, LA 70092
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) On or about January 6, 2016, at the 306 Maple Ridge, Metairie, LA job site the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold system was fully planked. The employee was on the scaffold system moving fiberglass from around a window frame of a second floor window.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about January 6, 2016, at the 306 Maple Ridge, Metairie, LA job site the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold system was supported by mud sills. The employee was on the scaffold system moving fiberglass from around a window frame of a second floor window.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access. On or about January 6, 2016, at the 306 Maple Ridge, Metairie, LA job site the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold system was equipped with a ladder for access to upper levels. The employee was on the second tier of scaffold system moving fiberglass from around a window frame of a second floor window.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 G04 XV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Cross bracing used in place of a mid rail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces is between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform or as a top rail when the crossing point of two braces is not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform or as a top rail when the crossing point of two braces is between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform. The endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart. On or about January 6, 2016, at the 306 Maple Ridge, Metairie, LA job site the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold system had a mid-rail in place. The employee was on the scaffold system moving fiberglass from around a window frame of a second floor window.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about January 6, 2016, at the 306 Maple Ridge, Metairie, LA job site the employer failed to ensure that employees were protected by a fall protection system. Employees were on the first story roof applying stucco to the outer wall of the second story.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
RENO, NV—2026-07-16 00:00:00
DC MASONRY
WINNETKA, IL—2026-07-15 00:00:00
CHICAGO STUCCO CO.
WINNETKA, IL—2026-07-15 00:00:00
CHICAGO STUCCO CO.
LODI, NJ—2026-07-15 00:00:00
J & O MASONRY CONTRACTORS
DORAVILLE, GA—2026-07-14 00:00:00
SUDLOW CONCRETE, INC.
More inspections in LA
PLAQUEMINE, LA—2026-07-15 00:00:00
SE TYLOSE USA, INC.
LAFAYETTE, LA—2026-07-15 00:00:00
GULLEY'S WELDING & STEEL ERECTORS, INC.
LAFAYETTE, LA—2026-07-15 00:00:00
ACORREA COMPANY, LLC
LAFAYETTE, LA—2026-07-14 00:00:00
GULF COAST WOODWORK, L.L.C.
BELLE ROSE, LA—2026-07-14 00:00:00
OXYCHEM
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341168284.