Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: L&M WAREHOUSE & PACKING OF NORTH FLORIDA, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of L&M WAREHOUSE & PACKING OF NORTH FLORIDA, LLC in 131 W. CRACKER SWAMP RD., EAST PALATKA, FL 32131 (NAICS 424480). OSHA activity number 341319812.

Watch L&M Warehouse & Packing OF North Florida, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for L&M Warehouse & Packing OF North Florida, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
131 W. CRACKER SWAMP RD.
City
EAST PALATKA
State
FL
ZIP
32131
Mailing
131 W. CRACKER SWAMP RD., EAST PALATKA, FL 32131
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424480
Employees
72
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $2520.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet were exposed to electrical hazards:  a.  On or about, March 11, 2016, employees working alongside forklifts in the packing and warehouse area were exposed to crushing hazards to their feet in that the employer did not provide protective footwear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.178 L04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, was not conducted as required by paragraph (l)(4)(ii) when the operator had been involved in an accident or near-miss incident to ensure that the operator had the knowledge and skills needed to operate the powered industrial truck safely.  a.  On or about March 4, 2016, employees were further exposed to the hazards of being struck by forklifts when a forklift operator who had been involved in an accident that caused an employee injury, was allowed to continue forklift operations without receiving refresher training and evaluation for forklift operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years:  a.   On or about March 11, 2016, in the packing and warehouse areas, performance evaluations had not been conducted for forklift operators, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by forklifts and pallets of produce.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 N04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(4): Industrial truck driver(s) were not required to travel with the load trailing whenever the load obstructed forward view:  a.   On or about March 4, 2016, in the wrap area, the forklift was being driven forward with the load obstructing the forward view and path of travel resulting in an injury to an employee struck by the supported load on the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a.   On or about March 11, 2016, in the receiving and packing area, the BaleMaster vertical baling machine was not guarded in that the gate guard interlock switch was bypassed, exposing employees to an amputation hazard from the shear point of hydraulic ram and front door plate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341319812.