Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ESBIN RODRIGO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESBIN RODRIGO in 1 EDEN COURT, NORTH BRUNSWICK, NJ 08902 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341404606.

Watch Esbin Rodrigo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Esbin Rodrigo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ESBIN RODRIGO
Site address
1 EDEN COURT
City
NORTH BRUNSWICK
State
NJ
ZIP
08902
Mailing
104 PARK LANE, HAMILTON, NJ 08610
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $2672.00
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition.  a)  1 Eden Court, North Brunswick, NJ 08902:  Employees who were operating pneumatic nail guns were not provided with and required to wear eye protection.  This hazard was observed on 4/13/16.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) 1 Eden Court, North Brunswick, NJ 08902:  The employer did not ensure that all employees who were engaged in roofing work had been adequately trained in the hazards associated with falls and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize the hazards.  This hazard was observed on 4/13/16.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $2672.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a)  1 Eden Court, North Brunswick, NJ 08902:   The aluminum extension ladder which was being used to access the roof did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.  This hazard was observed on 4/13/16.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $24942.00 · Current $24942.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) 1 Eden Court, North Brunswick, NJ 08902:  Employees who were engaged in residential roofing work were exposed to fall hazards of up to 20 feet 7 inches and were not protected by an adequate fall protection system.  Hazard was observed on 4/13/16.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $24942

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341404606.