WEST HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: LUCKA'S ROOFING & SIDING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUCKA'S ROOFING & SIDING LLC in 87 MORRIS STREET, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341463107.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUCKA'S ROOFING & SIDING LLC
- Site address
- 87 MORRIS STREET
- City
- WEST HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06516
- Mailing
- 28 MORTON STREET, NORWALK, CT 06854
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1700.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Jobsite: The employee who was installing asphalt roofing shingles with the Bostich RN46-1coil roofing nail gun was not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1700
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: Jobsite: The attachment plug of the extension cord used to supply power to the compressor was missing the grounding pin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were engaged in residential construction activities from the high pitched roof were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 19 feet to the ground by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1320.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed) Jobsite: The side rails of the ladder that was used to gain access to the roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1320
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level: Jobsite: The portable extension ladder that was used to access the roof was neither set up on stable and even surface nor appropriately secured to prevent from displacement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B12
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive side rails: Jobsite: The aluminum extension ladder, used to access the roof was neither set up safely by maintaining a minimum safety distance from the residential power line nor other safe means utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards. Jobsite: The employees who were using a ladder to access the roof were not trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
PORTLAND, OR—2026-07-17 00:00:00
317744797 - JBC ROOFING LLC
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-17 00:00:00
COBRA'S ROOFING LLC
SYRACUSE, NY—2026-07-17 00:00:00
NAMICELA HOME SOLUTIONS INC
BRADLEY, IL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
JUAN CRUZ DBA ROOFBOYS LLC
PONCE INLET, FL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
RESOLUTE ROOFING LLC
More inspections in CT
EAST HAVEN, CT—2026-07-16 00:00:00
BIANCO & SONS, LLC
ENFIELD, CT—2026-07-16 00:00:00
MOMS ENFIELD
DAYVILLE, CT—2026-07-16 00:00:00
HARBOR FREIGHT
NEW BRITAIN, CT—2026-07-14 00:00:00
JANANII, LLC
NEWINGTON, CT—2026-07-14 00:00:00
TRUSS MANUFACTURING INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341463107.