Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUCKA'S ROOFING & SIDING LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUCKA'S ROOFING & SIDING LLC in 87 MORRIS STREET, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341463107.

Watch Lucka'S Roofing & Siding LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lucka'S Roofing & Siding LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
87 MORRIS STREET
City
WEST HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06516
Mailing
28 MORTON STREET, NORWALK, CT 06854
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1700.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.       Jobsite:  The employee who was installing asphalt roofing shingles with the Bostich RN46-1coil roofing nail gun was not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    Jobsite:  The attachment plug of the extension cord used to supply power to the compressor was missing the grounding pin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Jobsite:  The employees who were engaged in residential construction activities from the high pitched roof were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 19 feet to the ground by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1320.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed)    Jobsite:  The side rails of the ladder that was used to gain access to the roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1320
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:  Jobsite:  The portable extension ladder that was used to access the roof was neither set up on stable and even surface nor appropriately secured to prevent from displacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive side rails:  Jobsite:  The aluminum extension ladder, used to access the roof was neither set up safely by maintaining a minimum safety distance from the residential power line nor other safe means utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards.    Jobsite:  The employees who were using a ladder to access the roof were not trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341463107.