1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS in SHEPARD ST., RIPON, WI 54971 (NAICS 333312). OSHA activity number 341503670.

Watch Alliance Laundry Systems — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alliance Laundry Systems is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
SHEPARD ST.
City
RIPON
State
WI
ZIP
54971
Mailing
P.O.BOX 990, RIPON, WI 54971
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333312
Employees
1336
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1904.10 A

Other-than-serious 34 instances 1100 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1904.10(a): The employer did not record all cases on the OSHA 300 Log when an employee's hearing test (audiogram) revealed that the employee had experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in one or both ears, and the employee's total hearing level is 25 decibels (dB) or more above audiometric zero (averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in the same ear(s) as the STS:  On or about June 28, 2016, the employer did not record all cases on the OSHA 300 Log when employees' hearing tests (audiograms) revealed that the employees had experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in one or both ears:  a)  Case No. 18 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 71-1 Utility General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 17, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  b)  Case No 20 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 34-1 Mechanic employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 22, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  c)   Case No. 24 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 01-1 CNC Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 4, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  d)  Case No. 25 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 11-1 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 5, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  e)  Case No. 26 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 03-2 Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on: 1) a retest conducted on May 3, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test, and 2) insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  f)  Case No. 27 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 34-3 Mechanic employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 10, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 20, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  g)  Case No. 28 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 09-2 Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 10, 2016. The case was lined out based on:  1) a retest conducted on May 23, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test, and 2) insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  h)  Case No. 30 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 08-01 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 5, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  i)  Case No. 31 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 01-1 Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  j)  Case No. 33 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 08-01 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 17, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  k)  Case No. 34 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 71-1 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 17, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  l)  Case No. 35 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 16-2 Stock Trucker employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 3, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  m)  Case No. 36 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 34-2 Electro/Mechanical Tech employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 3, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  n)  Case No. 37 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 10-2 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 6, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  o)  Case No. 38 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 36-1 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 6, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  p)  Case No. 39 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 34-1 Mechanic employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 4, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  q)  Case No. 40 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 31-1 Stock Trucker employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on or about May 6, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  r)  Case No. 41 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 28-1 Milk Steel Welder employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 6, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  s)  Case No. 42 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 43-1 Work Instruction Technician employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 7, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 4, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  t)  Case No. 43 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 71-1 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 3, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  u)  Case No. 44 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 21-1 Utility Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 3, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  v)  Case No. 45 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 71-2 Utility Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 17, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  w)  Case No. 46 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 56-1 Lead Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  x)  Case No. 48 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 36-1 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 4, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  y)  Case No. 49 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 03-2 Setup Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  z)  Case No. 50 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 01-2 Coordinator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 10, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  aa)  Case No. 51 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 34-1 Mechanic employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 10, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  bb)  Case No. 52 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 03-2 Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  cc)  Case No. 53 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 36-1 Utility General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  dd)  Case No. 54 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 36-1 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 9, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 6, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  ee)  Case No. 55 of the 2016 Plant 1 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 11-1 General Assembly employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 8, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.  ff)  Case No. 4 of the 2016 Plant 2 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 54-2 Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 7, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 6, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  gg)  Case No. 8 of the 2016 Plant 2 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 45-1 Fab Cell Operator employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 7, 2016. The case was lined out based on a retest conducted on May 5, 2016, which was not within 30 days of the first test.  hh)  Case No. 13 of the 2016 Plant 2 300 Log was lined out (not recorded) for a Department 40-1 General Factory employee who experienced a work-related STS revealed during an annual audiogram on March 7, 2016. The case was lined out based on insufficient evidence to support the claim that the work environment did not at the very least contribute to the employee's STS.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341503670.