Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEOCELL OF GA

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NEOCELL OF GA in 4415 COMMERCE DR. SW, ATLANTA, GA 30336 (NAICS 424990). OSHA activity number 341709079.

Watch Neocell OF GA — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Neocell OF GA is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NEOCELL OF GA
Site address
4415 COMMERCE DR. SW
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30336
Mailing
4415 COMMERCE DR. SW, ATLANTA, GA 30336
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424990
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2850.00 · Current $1710.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a) Sink Area; The employer failed to ensure that employees required to mix liquid corrosives such as, but not limited to Signet Three-Compartment Sink Sanitizer, Signet Neutral Disinfectant, Signet Heavy Duty Floor Cleaner/Degreaser, and Signet Heavy Duty Non-Acid Washroom Cleaner/Disinfectant with water were provided with an eye wash station or other suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1710
  • — Z (S) $2850

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $1283.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a forklift.   a) Receiving Dock Area; The employer had not ensured that each employee operating the Toyota 5F8CHU25 forklift (SN 60254) was competent to operate the powered industrial truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1282.8
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2850.00 · Current $1710.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Throughout: The employer had not established or implemented a written Hazard Communication program.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to corrosive and irritant cleaning liquids.  Exposure to these chemicals could result in skin burns and/or irritation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1710
  • — Z (S) $2850

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Throughout: Employees were required to work with chemicals such as, but not limited to corrosive and irritant cleaning liquids.  The employer did not provide training specific to the hazards of chemicals used at the establishment to all employees working with hazardous chemicals. Exposure to these chemicals could result in skin burns and/or irritation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341709079.