OSHA Inspection: LUCIANO GOMEZ CONSTRUCTION

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2672.00 · Current $1736.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure:      Instances including, but not limited to the following:    a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection systems/devices while up on top of building walls to mark joist locations where fall hazards of up to approximately 20 feet existed.     b) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that fall protection systems/devices were used near the tops of stairway openings where fall hazards of up to approximately 9 feet existed.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-17 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and did not train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Instances including, but not limited to the following:  a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees were appropriately trained in fall protection prior to working up on top of building walls to mark joist locations where fall hazards of up to approximately 20 feet existed.   b) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees were appropriately trained in fall protection prior to working near the tops of stairway openings where fall hazards of up to approximately 9 feet existed.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2138.00 · Current $1389.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways with 4 or more risers or rising more than 30 inches, whichever was less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:      a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that the stairway system leading from the first floor to the second floor had a handrail.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways with 4 or more risers or rising more than 30 inches, whichever was less, were not equipped with at least one stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge:   a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that the stairway system leading from the first floor to the second floor had a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2138.00 · Current $1475.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The employer did not ensure that the top or top step of a stepladder was not used as a step:      a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees used stepladders safely in that an employee stood on the very top step of the step ladder to do work for marking joist areas.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-17 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv):  Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   a) Job site, at/near 1612 Graham Court, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about October 11, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that appropriate strain relief existed on the power cord for the air compressor.