Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: ZUNIGA BRICK AND STONE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ZUNIGA BRICK AND STONE in 3450 BRASELTON HWY, DACULA, GA 30019 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342116639.

Watch Zuniga Brick AND Stone — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Zuniga Brick AND Stone is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3450 BRASELTON HWY
City
DACULA
State
GA
ZIP
30019
Mailing
1211 ROSEMONT PARKWAY, ROSWELL, GA 30076
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a - On or about 8/7/2017, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 01, item 01 issued on March 10, 2017 with an abatement due date of April 6, 2017.  b - On or about 8/7/2017, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 01, item 3a, issued on March 10, 2017 with an abatement due date of April 6, 2017.  c -On or about 8/7/2017, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 01, item 3a, issued on March 10, 2017 with an abatement due date of April 6, 2017.  d - On or about 8/7/2017, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 01, item 3a, issued on March 10, 2017 with an abatement due date of April 6, 2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   a.  On or about 8/7/17, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 01, item 02 issued on March 13, 2017 with an abatement due date of April 6, 2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $1630.00
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions.  On 2/21/17, at the Buffalo's job site in Dacula, Georgia, the employer did not require employees to use dust mask respirators when dry cutting cinder blocks.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On 2/21/17, at the Buffalo's job site in Dacula, Georgia, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 18 feet as they performed mason activities from the second story of the building and at the edge of the fall hazard without the use of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $1630.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) per 29 CFR 1926.59: Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii).  On 3/21/17, the employer had not developed a Hazard Communication program to provide information to employees on the hazardous chemicals they work with, including Crystalline Silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1) per 29 CFR 1926.59: Chemical manufacturers and importers did not obtain or develop a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical and for each chemical that posed a hazard not otherwise classified that they produce or import  On 3/21/17, the employer had not developed a Hazard Communication program, including safety data sheets, to provide information to employees on the hazardous chemicals they work with, including Crystalline Silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) per 29 CFR 1926.59: Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  On 3/21/17, the employer had not trained employees in a Hazard Communication program to provide information on hazardous chemicals they work with, including Crystalline Silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342116639.