2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: CHARLES TUCKER

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CHARLES TUCKER in 6800 RIDGEWOOD TRAIL, TOLEDO, OH 43617 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342522315.

Watch Charles Tucker — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Charles Tucker is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CHARLES TUCKER
Site address
6800 RIDGEWOOD TRAIL
City
TOLEDO
State
OH
ZIP
43617
Mailing
3621 BURTON AVENUE, TOLEDO, OH 43612
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  A)    Charles Tucker, conducting work at 6800 Ridgewood Trail, Toledo, OH 43617: On or about August 28, 2017, the employer did not provide abatement verification for the following citation items: Citation 1, Item 3. The citation items became final order on September 28, 2017, with abatement due date on August 28, 2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2390.00 · Current $2390.00
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact:   A)    Charles Tucker, conducting work at 6800 Ridgewood Trail, Toledo, OH 43617: On or about August 2, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees were wearing appropriate eye protection such as, but not limited to, safety glasses while securing shingles to the roof with the pneumatic nail gun. Employees were exposed to the hazards of eye injury from flying objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2390

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2390.00 · Current $2390.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  A)    Charles Tucker, conducting work at 6800 Ridgewood Trail, Toledo, OH 43617: On or about August 2, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from head injury hazards by protective hard hats while working below employees who were sheathing 7/12 pitch roof of the one story residential building. Employees were exposed to potential impact injuries caused by falling materials and/or equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2390

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4183.00 · Current $4183.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   A)    Charles Tucker, conducting work at 6800 Ridgewood Trail, Toledo, OH 43617: On or about August 2, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees had been trained in the appropriate use of fall protection such as, but not limited to, the use of personal fall arrest systems, or alternative measures of fall protection while sheathing a 7/12 pitch roof of the one story residential building. Employees did not use fall protection and were exposed to approximately 11 feet fall hazard from the roof to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2390.00 · Current $2390.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  A)    Charles Tucker, conducting work at 6800 Ridgewood Trail, Toledo, OH 43617: On or about August 2, 2017, the employer did not ensure that straight ladders, used to access the roof of the one story residential building, were secured at their tops to a rigid support, and grasping devices, such as grab rails, were provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladders. The employees were exposed to approximately 11 feet fall hazards when using the ladders to access the working level in order to conduct roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2390

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8366.00 · Current $8366.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   A)    Charles Tucker, conducting work at 6800 Ridgewood Trail, Toledo, OH 43617: On or about August 2, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from fall hazards while sheathing a 7/12 pitch roof of the one story residential building. Employees were exposed to approximately 11 feet fall hazard from the roof to the ground below.    Charles Tucker was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA Inspection # 995758, Citation number 1, Item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on 11/14/2014, with respect to a workplace located at 4994 Main Street, Sylvania, OH 43560.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8366

View CHARLES TUCKER's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342522315.