Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MAYRA FLORES ROOFING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAYRA FLORES ROOFING in 11230 WEST AVENUE, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78213 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342606654.

Watch Mayra Flores Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mayra Flores Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11230 WEST AVENUE
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78213
Mailing
1647 GORMAN ST, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78202
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  Southeast side: On or about September 01, 2017, employees without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards greater than 6 feet to the paved ground below, while removing old tiles on the roof of a commercial building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about September 01, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 6 feet to the paved ground below, while removing old tiles on the roof of a commercial building without being trained to recognize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  Southeast building: On or about September 1, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards, when using a ladder that was less than 3 feet above the upper landing surface, while gaining access to the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder was not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  Southeast building:  On or about September 1, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards, while using a Little Giant extension ladder that was not set at a proper angle to gain access to a commercial roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342606654.