Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUCIANO GUAMAN LEMA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUCIANO GUAMAN LEMA in 153 KING ST, SPRINGFIELD, MA 01104 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342662756.

Watch Luciano Guaman Lema — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luciano Guaman Lema is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUCIANO GUAMAN LEMA
Site address
153 KING ST
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
01104
Mailing
69 HARKER AVE, WATERBURY, CT 06705
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The Employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date:  As of February 12, 2018, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement was completed for the violations from Inspection 1266275, issued on 11/28/17 with a final order date of 12/22/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  As of February 12, 2018, the employer had not submitted to the Agency the abatement certification required for the serious violations issues on 11/28/17, which it was indicated that such abatement documentation was required to be submitted to the Agency.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4183.00 · Current $4183.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  a) 153 King St., Springfield, MA: On or about September 26, an employee was roofing this residence, more than 22 feet above the ground below without any fall protection.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4183.00 · Current $4183.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back:  a) 153 King St., Springfield, MA: On or about September 26, an employee was roofing this residence, more than 22 feet above the ground below with his lifelines (2 of them) tied around his torso instead of being attached to the harness in the center of the wearer's back.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4183.00 · Current $4183.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not  provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:  a) 153 King St., Springfield, MA: On or about September 26, the employees roofing this residence, more than 22 feet above the ground below had not been given any training by this employer pertaining to fall protection.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record:  a) 153 King St., Springfield, MA: On or about September 26, the employer had not prepared a written certification verifying that his employees had been trained in fall protection practices in accordance with this subpart.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4183.00 · Current $4183.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used only for the purpose for which they were designed:  a) 153 King St., Springfield, MA: On or about September 26, the employees roofing this residence, were observed climbing the rails of the shingle lift to access this work location.  Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342662756.