OSHA Inspection: MHI HOTEL SERVICES, LLC

Issued

2018-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-05-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9239.00 · Current $6929.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:     a)  At the facility, where employees working near energized electrical equipment when assisting and supervising the work being performed by contractors were not trained and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335.

Issued

2018-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9239.00 · Current $6929.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

1910.333(a)(1):   Live parts to which an employee may be exposed were not deenergized before the employee works on or near them, unless the employer could demonstrate that deenergizing introduces additional or increased hazards or was infeasible due to equipment design or operational limitations:       a)  At the facility, on or about November 10, 2017, where the electricity running to the Square D Power Style, 4 section switchgear was not deenergized prior to employees working near them.

Issued

2018-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-05-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9239.00 · Current $6929.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 and did not make it available for inspection by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives:     a)  At the facility, where written procedures for using safety related work practices on the Square D Power Style, 4 section switchgear were not maintained.

Issued

2018-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-05-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9239.00 · Current $6930.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:      a)  At the facility, on or about November 10, 2017, where the Chief Engineer was not provided with and did not use electrical protective equipment that would protect his body and face from arc flashes.