OSHA Inspection: DUXWORTH ROOFING SHEET METAL, INC.

Issued

2018-01-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2956.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.      a) 204 Decatur St., New Orleans, LA; On or about December 13, 2017, the employer allowed an employee to operate a Ryobi skilsaw and a Milwaukee drill driver while not wearing eye protection.

Issued

2018-01-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protection equipment did not meet the requirements of ANSI Z87.1-1968, Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Protection:        a) 204 Decatur St., New Orleans, LA; On or about October 19, 2017, the employer allowed an employee to operate a Ryobi Saw and a Milwaukee drill driver while not wearing ANSI approved eye protection.

Issued

2018-01-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3696.00 · Current $1478.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   a) 204 Decatur St., New Orleans, LA; On or about December 13, 2017, employees were allowed to work on a leading edge while not wearing fall protection. The employees were decking an awning at approximately 16 feet above the ground.

Issued

2018-01-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3696.00 · Current $1478.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder.   a) 204 Decatur St., New Orleans, LA; On or about December 13, 2017, the employer allowed employees to access an extension ladder that was susceptible to vehicle traffic. The ladder was setup in the street and did not have a barricade to keep vehicle traffic away from the ladder.