Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LALO STUCCO MASONRY AND SCAFFOLDS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LALO STUCCO MASONRY AND SCAFFOLDS, INC. in 23303 EMERALD PASS, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78261 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343145744.

Watch Lalo Stucco Masonry AND Scaffolds, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lalo Stucco Masonry AND Scaffolds, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
23303 EMERALD PASS
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78261
Mailing
135 MABELLE DR., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78233
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3326.00 · Current $1600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights is no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary:    Southside of residential construction:  On or about May 8, 2018, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco and silicon to a wall without adequate planking on the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $3326

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used, and cross braces were used as a means of access:      Southside of residential construction:  On or about May 8, 2018, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing stucco activities from a scaffold with no ladder for access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3326.00 · Current $1600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffold was not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered only under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:    Southside of residential construction:  On or about May 8, 2018, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing stucco activities while working from a scaffold not erected by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $3326

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level:    Southside of residential construction:  On or about May 8, 2018, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 10 feet while performing stucco work from a scaffold platform without guardrails, or other fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold effectively trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  Southside of residential construction:  On or about May 8, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing stucco work from a scaffold without being trained to recognize the hazards and procedures to avoid them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $1300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure:    Southside of residential construction:  On or about May 8, 2018, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet, while applying silicon to windows without using a personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to a fall hazard, that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of a fall and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Roof of new residential construction:  On or about May 8, 2018, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of greater than 6 feet while performing stucco activities on a roof without being trained in fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343145744.