Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MC DELTA ROOFING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MC DELTA ROOFING LLC in 77 LAFAYETTE AVENUE, N WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343149365.

Watch MC Delta Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MC Delta Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
77 LAFAYETTE AVENUE
City
N WHITE PLAINS
State
NY
ZIP
10603
Mailing
44 COURT ST. SUITE 1217, BROOKLYN, NY 11201
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    Location: entire site  On or about: 5/2/18    a) Employees, who were working below overhead hazards related to roofing work, were not provided with hard hats.          NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.852 A

Serious Gravity 1 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.852(a): Material was dropped to points lying outside the exterior walls of the structure which had not been effectively protected:  Location: dumpster area On or about: 5/2/18  a) Employees were throwing roofing materials off the roof to a dumpster below. The area below was not effectively protected.       NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $3600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): "Roofing work on Low-slope roofs." Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see Appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted:      location: upper and lower roof  on or about: 5/2/18    a) Employees, engaged in roofing activities, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of up to 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $5174

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3696.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    location: entire site  on or about: 5/2/18    a) Employee, exposed to a fall hazard while engaged in roofing activities, were not provided with fall protection training.       NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3696

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail,  was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:      location: ladder between ground and lower roof  on or about: 5/2/18      a) Employees were using an metal extension ladder to access the lower roof.  The ladder extended above the roof surface 2 1/2 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary:    location: entire site  on or about: 5/2/18      a) Employees were using metal extension ladders to access the roof. The employees were not provided with ladder safety training.      NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343149365.