Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MAYEKAWA U.S.A., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAYEKAWA U.S.A., INC. in 11222 DISCO, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216 (NAICS 333415). OSHA activity number 343216131.

Watch Mayekawa U.S.A., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mayekawa U.S.A., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11222 DISCO
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78216
Mailing
11222 DISCO, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333415
Employees
179
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6652.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    Outside the Maintenance Shop:  On or about June 8, 2018 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to provide a chemical apron to employees exposed to a petroleum hydrocarbon chemical solvent while performing cleaning operations using a wire brush and/or metal basket to dip, degrease and clean compressor/metal parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $6652

1910.134 E02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6652.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(2)(ii): The medical evaluation did not obtain the information requested by the questionnaire in Sections 1 and 2, Part A of Appendix C of 29 CFR 1910.134:  Outside the Maintenance Shop: On or about June 8, 2018 and at other times prior to, employees provided 3M NIOSH half face respirator exposed to airborne vapors while performing cleaning operations using a chemical solvent without having an OSHA respirator medical evaluation questionnaire (mandatory) prior to beginning the work exposing the workers to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6652

1910.179 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4989.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(a)(5): The employer did not ensure that the rated load of each overhead crane was plainly marked on each side of the crane:    In the Maintenance Shop:  On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees utilized an A-Frame Crane which did not have 2,000 rated loaded on each side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4989

1910.179 N01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11640.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(1): Crane(s) were loaded beyond the rated load (maximum load for which the crane or individual hoist was designed and built by the manufacturer and shown on the equipment nameplate(s):     In the Maintenance Shop: On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards, while using an A- Frame Aluminum Gantry Crane rated for 2,000 lbs (1 ton) with an attach JLC Coffin hoist of 4,000 lbs. (2 ton).  The A-frame crane was use to lift and transport compressor parts which exceeded the working load of the crane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $11640

1910.184 C01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6651.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(1): The employer did not ensure slings which were damaged or defective were not used.      In the Maintenance Shop:  On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards, while utilizing slings to lift equipment/compressor parts were not taken out of service:    a) In the Maintenance Shop: On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from utilizing sling which had evidence of excessive wear and frays, no markings regarding capacity and load bearing (sling blue in color Mfg. Tuff edge : 3 ft in length 1 inch wide), used to lift compressor parts.    b) In the Maintenance Shop: On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from utilizing sling which had excessive wear and evidence of fraying and abrasions along the edges of the yellow sling, Mfg.Edgeguard :6 ft in length and 1 inch wide, used to lift compressor parts.    c) In the Maintenace Shop: On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from utilizing sling which had evidence of worn stitching in load bearing area, sling blue in color Mfg. Tuff edge: 4 ft in length 2 inch wide, used to lift compressor parts.     d) In the Maintenance Shop: On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from utilizing a round sling which had evidence of excessive wear and no manufacture markings regarding load capacity, size and manufacture.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6651

1910.184 E01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4989.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:    Inside the Maintenance Shop:  On or about June 8, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards, while utilizing alloy steel chains to lift equipment which did not have identification tags.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4989

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343216131.