SAXONBURG, PA —
OSHA Inspection: BRAYMAN PRECAST, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BRAYMAN PRECAST, LLC in 2900 SOUTH NOAH DRIVE, SAXONBURG, PA 16056 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 343595724.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRAYMAN PRECAST, LLC
- Site address
- 2900 SOUTH NOAH DRIVE
- City
- SAXONBURG
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16056
- Mailing
- 1000 JOHN ROEBLING WAY, SAXONBURG, PA 16056
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327390
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1053 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9282.00 · Current $6250.00 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(c): The employer did not ensure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 µg/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA: a) At the facility, on or about March 14, 2019 - A Team Leader was exposed to respirable crystalline silica at a time weighted average exposure of 85.8 micrograms per cubic meter of air while assembling forms in the northwest area of the plant. The Batch Plant, located along the east wall of the plant, began mixing concrete at 10:50am during the Team Leader's shift. This level is 1.72 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air as a time weighted average concentration. Sampling was performed by an OSHA compliance officer on March 14, 2019 for 456 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the shift.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $6250
- — C (S) $9282
- — Z (S) $9282
1910.1053 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1): The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible: a) At the facility, on or about March 14, 2019 - The employer failed to use work practice controls to reduce a Team Leader's exposure to respirable crystalline silica below the PEL.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 G01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(g)(1)(i): Respiratory protection was not provided where exposures exceeded the PEL during periods necessary to install or implement feasible engineering and work practice controls: a) At the facility, on or about March 14, 2019 - The employer failed to provide respiratory protection to a Team Leader who was exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the PEL during a period where not all feasible engineering and work practice controls were implemented.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 D03 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9282.00 · Current $6250.00 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(3)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of one or more personal breathing zone air samples that reflect the exposures of employees on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area: a) At the facility, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer failed to perform adequate initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure of employees working in the shop to respirable crystalline silica. Monitoring conducted in April 2016 and March 2018 did not cover the entire exposure period. b) At the facility, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer failed to perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure of employees working in the shop to respirable crystalline silica while cement was delivered and pumped into the silo. Monitoring conducted in April 2016 and March 2018 did not cover the employees' in the shop exposure to respirable crystalline silica created from the task of filling the silo with cement. c) At the facility, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer failed to perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure of the crane operator on the pour crew to respirable crystalline silica while mixing and pouring concrete.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $6250
- — C (S) $9282
- — Z (S) $9282
1910.1053 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9282.00 · Current $6250.00 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(e)(1): The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of respirable crystalline silica was, or could have been reasonably expected to be, in excess of the PEL: a) At the facility, on or about March 14, 2019 - The employer failed to establish a regulated area when a Team Leader's exposure to respirable crystalline silica was above the PEL.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $6250
- — C (S) $9282
- — Z (S) $9282
1910.1053 I01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9282.00 · Current $6250.00 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to each employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who has been occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year: a) At the facility, on or about March 14, 2019 - The employer failed to make medical surveillance available to a Team Leader who was exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the PEL.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $6250
- — C (S) $9282
- — Z (S) $9282
1910.1053 F02 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i)(A): The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica: a) At the facility, on or about November 13, 2018 - The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the running batch plant that exposes employees working on the shop floor to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 F02 I B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i)(B): The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task: a) At the facility, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure control plan did not contain a description of the dust collector installed on the cement silo used to limit exposure to respirable crystalline silica of employees building forms in the shop and the pour crew.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 K01 II A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(k)(1)(ii)(A): Exposure measurement records taken by the employer to assess employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica did not contain the date of measurement for each sample taken: a) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number one exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the date of measurement. b) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number two exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the date of measurement. c) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number three exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the date of measurement. d) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number four exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the date of measurement.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 K01 II B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(k)(1)(ii)(B): Exposure measurement records taken by the employer to assess employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica did not contain the task monitored: a) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number one exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the task monitored. b) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number two exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the task monitored. c) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number three exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the task monitored. d) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number four exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the task monitored.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 K01 II D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(k)(1)(ii)(D): Exposure measurement records taken by the employer to assess employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica did not contain the number, duration, and results of samples taken: a) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number one exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the duration of samples taken. b) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number two exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the duration of samples taken. c) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number three exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the duration of samples taken. d) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number four exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the duration of samples taken.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 K01 II G
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(k)(1)(ii)(G): Exposure measurement records taken by the employer to assess employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica did not contain the name, social security number, and job classification of all employees represented by the monitoring, indicating which employees were actually monitored: a) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number one exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name and job classification of all employees represented by the monitoring. b) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number two exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name and job classification of all employees represented by the monitoring. c) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number three exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name and job classification of all employees represented by the monitoring. d) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1600883, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number four exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name and job classification of all employees represented by the monitoring. e) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1800798, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number three exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain name of all employees represented by the monitoring. f) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1800798, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number five exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name of all employees represented by the monitoring. g) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1800798, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number six exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name of all employees represented by the monitoring. h) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1800798, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number seven exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name of all employees represented by the monitoring. i) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1800798, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number eight exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name of all employees represented by the monitoring. j) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1800798, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number nine exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name of all employees represented by the monitoring. k) On the exposure measurement record, Laboratory Report No. 1800798, on or about November 13, 2018 - The employer's exposure measurement record of employee number two exposure to respirable cristobalite and respirable quartz did not contain the name of all employees represented by the monitoring.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at BRAYMAN PRECAST, LLC
SAXONBURG, PA—2018-11-13 00:00:00
BRAYMAN PRECAST, LLC
View BRAYMAN PRECAST, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327390)
OGDEN, UT—2026-07-10
OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
CHARDON, OH—2026-07-09
JAB SUPPLY CORPORATION
LINDON, UT—2026-07-07
NEW CAST STONE
ANDERSON, CA—2026-07-06
OUTDOOR CREATIONS INC.
MCKINNEY, TX—2026-07-01
QUIKRETE
More inspections in PA
MILTON, PA—2026-07-10
HOMETOWN FOODS CHEF BOYARDEE CO.
SUNBURY, PA—2026-07-10
DEMPSEY UNIFORM & LINEN SUPPLY, INC
LANDISVILLE, PA—2026-07-10
FAIRVIEW DEMOLITION LLC
YORK, PA—2026-07-10
AMERICAN SPECIALTY SYSTEMS INC.
WILLIAMSPORT, PA—2026-07-10
INTERNATIONAL PAINT PROS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343595724.