OSHA Inspection: BIG OKI, LLC

Issued

2018-12-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3298.00 · Current $2309.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, Super Clean Concentrated Glass Cleaner (skin irritation) and motor oil (skin irritation).

Issued

2018-12-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  The employer did not compile a list of chemicals present on site.

Issued

2018-12-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical  The employer did not ensure that the 55 gallon drums of motor oil (skin irritation) located against the wall of garage 6 were labeled with the chemical identity and hazard.

Issued

2018-12-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  The employer did not train employees on the hazards of the chemicals such as glass cleaner (skin irritation) and motor oil (skin irritation).