OSHA Inspection: SHIN-ETSU SILICONES OF AMERICA

Issued

2019-01-23 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $11934.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5): Respiratory protection retraining was not conducted annually:    On or about November 30, 2018, the dispersion mixer operators were required to wear a powered air-purifying respirator by the employer; however, the company had not provided respiratory protection training annually in accordance with the standard.

Issued

2019-01-23 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-13 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $11934.00 · Current $10000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1053(c): The employer did not ensure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 ug/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA:    On or about December 7, 2018, the operator working at the dispersion mixer was exposed to respirable dust containing crystalline silica at 156.329 ug/m3, which is approximately 3.127 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 ug/m3.  ; Exposure calculations included a zero increment for 46 minutes not sampled. At this time employees are being exposed to levels of respirable crystalline silica above the PEL.

Issued

2019-01-23 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-13 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1): The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible:    For the employee including, but not limited to, the employee whose exposure is described in Citation 1, Item 2(a):    The operator working at the dispersion mixer was exposed to respirable dust containing crystalline silica at 156.329 ug/m3 which is approximately 3.127 times the permissable exposure limit (PEL) of 50 ug/m3. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for 46 minutes not sampled. At this time, employees are being exposed to levels above the PEL and the employer shall require mandatory use of a respirator until feasible engineering controls can be put in place.    General methods of control applicable in this circumstance include, but are not limited to the following:    1) Re-evaluate the ventilation systems for ways to improve air movement/capture of the high levels of silica dust generated while running the dispersion mixer to further ensure the most adequate removal of the silica dust from the worker exposure;    2) Re-evaluate the existing work practices in the dispersion mixing area to reduce the worker exposures to the airborne silica dust;    3) Explore the utilization of a downdraft table with local exhaust ventilation to further assist in removal of the high levels of silica dust.    STEP 1: Effective respiratory protection shall be provided and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented, or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to the respirable dust permissible exposure limits. Abatement period by (5 working days)    STEP 2: Submit to the area director a written, detail plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measure to control employee exposure to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following action which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation. Abatement period by (15 working days)    1) Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options;    2) Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design;    3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; and    4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls.    STEP 3: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Abatement period by (30 working days)

Issued

2019-01-23 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about November 30, 2018, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed. Safety glasses, PAPR respirators, and steel toed shoes were required.