OSHA Inspection: NRG FAMILY CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Issued

2019-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2273.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions.    a) 904 Center St. Bethlehem, PA - on or about March 20, 2019,  an employee performing roofing activities with the use of a pneumatic nail gun was not protected with the use of eye protection.

Issued

2019-05-15 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3978.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a) 904 Center St. Bethlehem, PA - on or about March 20, 2019, employees were performing residential roof work, approximately 15 feet from grade, without utilizing any means of fall protection.

Issued

2019-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) 904 Center St. Bethlehem, PA - on or about March 20, 2019, employees were performing residential roof work, approximately 15 feet from grade, without receiving fall protection training prior to the start of the work.

Issued

2019-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2842.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a) 904 Center St. Bethlehem, PA - on or about March 20, 2019, employees used an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof of a residence, but the rungs did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.