Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ROBERTO GOMEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROBERTO GOMEZ in 1050 BRANGER DRIVE, MINERAL POINT, WI 53565 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343882205.

Watch Roberto Gomez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roberto Gomez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROBERTO GOMEZ
Site address
1050 BRANGER DRIVE
City
MINERAL POINT
State
WI
ZIP
53565
Mailing
3015 W. 67TH STREET, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 2.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   The employer failed to submit documentation of abatement within 10 days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 1.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.  On or about March 27, 2019 employees preforming installation of shingles on a low-slope roof at a height greater than six were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  On or about March 27, 2019 to access the working level, individuals were utilizing a portable metal extension ladder that was not extended three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

View ROBERTO GOMEZ's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343882205.