Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HULL ASSOCIATES, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HULL ASSOCIATES, LLC in 1703 EVAN RD., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78258 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344152251.

Watch Hull Associates, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hull Associates, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1703 EVAN RD.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78258
Mailing
2300 W. MARSHALL DR, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75051
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  West side of the residential construction site, building 7: On or about July 15, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below while installing the joists on the roof.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3000
  • — C (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

1926.502 K01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(1): The fall protection plan did not conform to the provisions specified in 1926.502(k)(1) through (k)(10):   Instances: (a) failure to identify each location where conventional fall protection methods cannot be used, and classifying these locations as controlled access zones; (b) failure to implement a safety monitoring system when no other alternative measure had been implemented; and (c) failure to include a statement that provides the name or other method of identification for each employee who is designated to work in controlled access zones. West side of the residential construction site, building 7: On or about July 15, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, without a written fall protection plan that conformed to the regulatory requirements.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $3000
  • — C (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

1926.502 K07

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(7): The fall protection plan did not identify each location where conventional fall protection methods cannot be used, these locations were not then classified as controlled access zones having to comply with the criteria of paragraph (g) of this section:  West side of the residential construction site, building 7: On or about July 15, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below while framing.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

1926.502 K08

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(8): Where no other alternative measure has been implemented, the employer shall implement a safety monitoring system in conformance with 1926.502(h):  West side of the residential construction site, building 7: On or about July 15, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below while framing.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

1926.502 K09

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(9): The fall protection plan did not include a statement which provides the name or other method of identification for each employee who is designated to work in controlled access zones:  West side of the residential construction site, building 7: On or about July 15, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below while installing the joists on the roof.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): A training program was not provided to each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards, to enable that employee to recognize the hazards of falling, and be trained in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  West side of the residential construction site, building 7: On or about July 15, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below while framing.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $3000
  • — C (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

View HULL ASSOCIATES, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344152251.