Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MELFORD SPURGEON DBA SUNNYLAND CABINET

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MELFORD SPURGEON DBA SUNNYLAND CABINET in 2449 WASHINGTON RD, WASHINGTON, IL 61571 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 344500061.

Watch Melford Spurgeon DBA Sunnyland Cabinet — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Melford Spurgeon DBA Sunnyland Cabinet is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2449 WASHINGTON RD
City
WASHINGTON
State
IL
ZIP
61571
Mailing
2449 WASHINGTON RD, WASHINGTON, IL 61571
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $1157.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    On or about December 2, 2019, the employer provided a 3M tight-fitting half-mask respirator for employee use and the employer did not establish and implement elements of a respiratory protection program that include:    a) medical evaluation for the tight-fitting respirator;    b) cleaning schedule for the disinfecting the respirator;    c) maintenance and care of the respirator; and    d) storage of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1156.5
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.    On or about December 2, 2019, an employee in the Paint Room wore a tight-fitting half-mask respirator and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals:    On December 12, 2019, the employer provided a half-mask tight-fitting respirator and the respirator was stored in the Paint Room on a cart and was exposed to dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:    On or about December 2, 2019, an employee was provided an elastomeric tight-fitting half-mask respirator for use when spray painting and the employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D of this section in written or oral format when spray painting Matador White Post-Catalyzed Topcoat and Bernyl Unisurfacer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $1157.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about December 2, 2019, an employee spray painted wood cabinetry with Matador White Post-Catalyzed Topcoat and Bernyl Unisurfacer and the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program with at least a description of how the criteria for the following requirements would be met by the company:    a) use of labels and other forms of warning;    b) access to safety data sheets;    c) provision of hazardous chemical information and training to employees;    d) maintenance of an updated list of hazardous chemicals present at the facility;     e) methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks and hazards associated with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas; and    f) methods the employer will use to inform other employers on-site on their precautionary measures to protect employees during normal operating conditions and in foreseeable emergencies, the labeling system used in the workplace and to provide other employers on-site access to safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1156.5
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard that the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about December 2, 2019, an employee spray painted wood cabinetry with Matador White Post-Catalyzed Topcoat and Bernyl Unisurfacer and the employer did not provide information and training on the hazardous chemicals in the work area and the pictograms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.94 C04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.94(c)(4)(ii): Spray rooms did not have noncombustible fire doors and shutters:    On or about December 2, 2019, an employee spray painted wood cabinetry in the Paint Room and the employer did not provide the spray room with noncombustible fire doors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person which certified that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identified the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    On or about December 2, the employer did not develop and document a suitable personal protective equipment hazard assessment for the painting and sawing tasks, nor did they complete a written certification that included the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344500061.