Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ERNESTO MAZARIEGO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ERNESTO MAZARIEGO in (LOT #19) 916 STONEY CREEK, ALPHARETTA, GA 30009 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344586359.

Watch Ernesto Mazariego — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ernesto Mazariego is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ERNESTO MAZARIEGO
Site address
(LOT #19) 916 STONEY CREEK
City
ALPHARETTA
State
GA
ZIP
30009
Mailing
916 STONEY CREEK, AUSTELL, GA 30168
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  a) New residential construction located on Lot #19, Roof and second floor: On or about 01/28/2020, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating circular saws and pneumatic nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees operating these tools while engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4048.00 · Current $4048.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a) New residential construction located on Lot #19, Roof: On or about 01/28/2020, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to falls of 18-feet to the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not used while engaged in sheathing activities on a 12/12 pitched roof.   b) New residential construction located on Lot #19, Second level: On or about 01/28/2020, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to falls of 11-feet, 4-inches to the lower concrete surface below, in that a fall protection system was not provided on the second level of the structure while employees were engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  a) New residential construction located on Lot #19, Second floor job-made scaffold: On or about 01/28/2020, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to falls of 19-feet, 7-inches to the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not used while engaged in framing activities on a job made scaffold platform.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.403 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  a) New residential construction located on Lot #19, Roof and second floor: On or about 01/28/2020, and at times prior, the employer failed to inspect all of the electrical cords prior to the start of the shift. A 50-ft. flexible cord used to power a Makita (Model 5007F) 7-1/4-inch circular saw had a torn outer casing, and a damaged strain relief and was not removed from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344586359.