1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: ENVIRO EXPRESS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ENVIRO EXPRESS, INC. in 555 WORDIN AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06605 (NAICS 562111). OSHA activity number 344611157.

Watch Enviro Express, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Enviro Express, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
555 WORDIN AVENUE
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06605
Mailing
555 WORDIN AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06605
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562111
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3084.00 · Current $2200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces were kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition:    Facility: The employer did not ensure through providing appropriate safety means to protect employees from the hazards of trips, falls and other similar hazards due to missing approximately 5 feet and 8 inches long grate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $1600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and which identified the document as a certification of hazard assessment:     Facility: The employer did not verify through a written certification that the required Workplace Hazard Assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $1600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Facility:The employer did not establish and implement a worksite-specific written respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing and medical evaluation where employees were required to wear N95 Pro-work HY9812 white filtering respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  WORKSHOP:  The employees required to wear N95 Pro-Work HY9812 white filtering respirators were not medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to wear a respirator prior to fit test and prior to wearing respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   Facility: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to wear  N95 Pro-Work HY9812 white filtering respirators were fit tested prior to initial wear of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):  The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):   Facility: The employer did not ensure through providing training and performing evaluation that the employees required to wear N95 Pro-Work HY9812 white filtering respirators obtained minimum knowledges, skills and other items listed in section (i) through (vii) of this section.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $1600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    Facility: The employer did not ensure through providing training and performing evaluation that the employees required to operate the Mitsubishi powered industrial truck (PIT), Model AU 2187 and S/N AF17D04064, were competent to operate the PIT safely at all times.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  Facility: The Mitsubishi powered industrial truck (PIT), Model AU 2187 and S/N AF17D04064, having defective parts, such as (but not limited to) the propane clamp, horn, light and seat was not taken out of service until restored to safe operating conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  Facility: The Mitsubishi powered industrial truck (PIT), Model AU 2187 and S/N AF17D04064, having defective parts, such as (but not limited to) the propane clamp, horn, light and seat was not examined prior to placing in service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1000.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): A Log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), and/or Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, (OSHA Form 300-A), and/or the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) or equivalent forms were not kept by the establishment:    Facility:  The employer did not maintain the Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illness (OSHA Form 300) for the year of 2019 where there had been recordable injuries and/or illness.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $700
  • — Z (O) $1000

1904.32 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1000.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(6): The employer did not post an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent by February 1 thru April 30:    Facility: On or about February 6, 2020, the employer did not post the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300-A) for the year of 2019.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $700
  • — Z (O) $1000

View ENVIRO EXPRESS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344611157.