Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN MEDRANO CAMPOS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN MEDRANO CAMPOS in 201 BIRKSHIRE DR., GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344673397.

Watch Martin Medrano Campos — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin Medrano Campos is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
201 BIRKSHIRE DR.
City
GEORGETOWN
State
TX
ZIP
78626
Mailing
2900 TURNERSVILLE RD, BUDA, TX 78610
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $1735.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.    On or about 28 February 2020, and at times prior thereto, three worker were performing framing activities without the use of hard hats, exposing the workers to the hazard of being struck by falling tools, materials or debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $1735.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about 28 February 2020, a framer was using a pneumatic nail gun to apply rafters to the roof of a residence under construction without the use of safety glasses, exposing the worker to the hazard of being struck by flying debris or projectiles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  On or about 28 February 2020, three workers were performing framing activities on a residence under construction without the use of fall protection, exposing them to a fall hazard of approximately 17 feet from the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not train each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  On or about 28 February 2020, three workers were performing framing activities on a residence under construction without the use of fall protection. These workers were not trained in recognizing fall hazards, thus, exposing them to a fall hazard of approximately 17 feet from the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $1735.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):  Ladder was not used for the purpose for which it was designed.  On or about 28 February 2020, and at times prior thereto, framers used a fiberglass step ladder as means of access to the wood framing upper plate of a new residential construction instead of an extension ladder. The top step and step below top were stand on by employees to climb to the elevated surface were framing work was performed. The ladder did not extent three feet past the landing surface, thus exposing the employees to the hazards of slips, trips and falls due to the insufficient length.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: (a)    Date of Violation: 28 February 2020         Location: 201 Birkshire Dr. Georgetown, TX 78626                      Condition: Employees used the top and top step of a (Werner, ~6 feet, Step Ladder)  in order to access/egress the framing  wood upper plate of a residential new construction.  On or about 28 February 2020, employees used a fiberglass step ladder as means of access to the wood framing upper plate of a new residential construction instead of an extension ladder. The top step and step below top were stand on by employees to climb to the elevated surface were framing work was performed. The ladder did not extent three feet past the landing surface, thus exposing the employees to the hazards of slips, trips and falls due to the insufficient length.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344673397.