Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PHOENIX 1 RESTORATION & CONSTRUCTION, LTD

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PHOENIX 1 RESTORATION & CONSTRUCTION, LTD in 802 SAN MARCOS ST., AUSTIN, TX 78702 (NAICS 712120). OSHA activity number 344836291.

Watch Phoenix 1 Restoration & Construction, LTD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Phoenix 1 Restoration & Construction, LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
802 SAN MARCOS ST.
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78702
Mailing
14032 DISTRIBUTION WAY, DALLAS, TX 75234
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
712120
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3856.00 · Current $2314.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):  On or about June 1st, 2020, and at times prior thereto and thereafter, the employer had not evaluated worker exposure to airborne lead levels for workers removing lead-based paint, exposing workers to the hazard of inhaling lead dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2313.6
  • — Z (S) $3856

1926.62 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level:  On or about June 1st, 2020, and at times prior thereto and thereafter, the employer had not conducted personal monitoring for each job classification of worker exposed to lead dust while removing lead-based paint, exposing workers to the hazard of inhaling lead aerosols.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 E02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3856.00 · Current $2314.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR  1926.62(e)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to achieve compliance with 29 CFR 1926.62(c) prior to commencement of the job:  On or about June 1st, 2020, and at times prior thereto and thereafter, the employer had not implemented a written compliance program to ensure workers removing lead-based paint were not exposed to airborne lead dust at or above the Permissible Exposure Limit (50 ug/m3), exposing workers to the hazard of inhaling lead dust. Elements of a written compliance program not implemented include, but are not limited to:  1926.62(e)(2)(ii)(A): Description of activities which emit lead, including controls and operating procedures; 1926.62(e)(2)(ii)(D): Air monitoring data which documents the source of lead emissions; 1926.62(e)(2)(ii)(F): Protective work clothing and equipment; 1926.62(e)(2)(ii)(H): Description of arrangement among contractors on multi-contractor sites with respect to responsibility for compliance with section 1926.62
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2313.6
  • — Z (S) $3856

1926.62 E02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3856.00 · Current $2314.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR  1926.62(e)(2)(iii): The compliance program required under 29 CFR 1926.62(e)(2) did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person:  On or about June 1st, 2020, and at times prior thereto and thereafter, the employer did not have a competent person onsite to conduct inspections, exposing workers to the hazard of inhaling lead dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2313.6
  • — Z (S) $3856

1926.62 H03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3856.00 · Current $2314.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(h)(3): Shoveling, dry or wet sweeping, and brushing were used when vacuuming or other equally effective methods were effective:  On or about June 1st, 2020, and at times prior thereto and thereafter, the employer allowed dry sweeping of lead dust as the primary removal method, exposing workers to the hazard of inhaling lead aerosols.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2313.6
  • — Z (S) $3856

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344836291.