Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BIG CITY MANUFACTURING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BIG CITY MANUFACTURING, INC. in 7561 MORLEY STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77061 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 345273353.

Watch BIG City Manufacturing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BIG City Manufacturing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7561 MORLEY STREET
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77061
Mailing
P O BOX 1019, FRIENDSWOOD, TX 77549
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.215 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3121.00 · Current $1873.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.215(a)(1):  Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not used with safety guard(s):  a) At this facility, a Jett bench grinder lacked a spindle guard, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1872.6
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:     a) At this facility, the Jett bench grinder lacked a work rest, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01 I B

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2340.00 · Current $1404.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(g)(1)(i)(B):  For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the width of the working space in front of electrical equipment was less than the width of the equipment or 762 mm (30 inches), whichever was greater :  a)  At the sound end of the building, the width of the working space in front of the electrical equipment was less than 30 inches, exposing employees to electrical hazards.  b) At the engraving room, the width of the working space in front of the electrical equipment was less than the width of the equipment, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404
  • — Z (S) $2340

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2340.00 · Current $1404.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.305(b)(1)(ii):  Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  a)  At the south end of the building, the unused openings to an electrical power switch were not effectively closed, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404
  • — Z (S) $2340

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2340.00 · Current $1404.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.305(g)(2)(iii):  Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a)  At the sound end of the building strain relief was not provided to the male end of the electrical cord, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404
  • — Z (S) $2340

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent:  a)  At this facility, OSHA Forms 300, 301 and 300A were not used to record injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $438.00 · Current $263.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  a)  The employer did not establish and implement a worksite-specific procedures for ensuring employees voluntarily using a 3M half face respirator, #60921, were medically able to use that respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $262.8
  • — Z (O) $438

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a)  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees voluntarily using a  3M half face respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345273353.