Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PIASA PLASTICS INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PIASA PLASTICS INC in 615 NORTH MAIN STREET, BRIGHTON, IL 62012 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 345534705.

Watch Piasa Plastics INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Piasa Plastics INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PIASA PLASTICS INC
Site address
615 NORTH MAIN STREET
City
BRIGHTON
State
IL
ZIP
62012
Mailing
615 NORTH MAIN STREET, BRIGHTON, IL 62012
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.27 A

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.27(a):29 CFR 1910.27(a): The employer did not ensure that scaffolds used in general industry meet the requirements in 29 CFR part 1926, subpart L (Scaffolds).  On or about September 9, 2022, and prior to, employees used a pallet supported by a forklift as a scaffold, which did not comply with the following requirements in 29 CFR 1926:  A.  29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6):  Scaffolds shall be designed by a qualified person and shall be constructed and loaded in accordance with that design.  B.  29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v):  Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied.  C.  29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):  For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee shall be protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  D.  29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i):  Guardrail systems shall be installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. Guardrail systems shall be installed before the scaffold is released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4351

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1865.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(a)(3):Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer had two slide locks on a rear emergency exit door, one of which was engaged in the locking position, which prevented employees from readily opening the door at all times.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1865.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(b)(2):Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  On or about September 16, 2021, at the rear of the warehouse, the employer did not ensure the exit door was marked by a sign reading "Exit".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $1554.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer required respirator use and did not have an established and implemented written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator had passed the appropriate fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(k):The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1865.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.157(e)(3):Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, employer did not conduct annual maintenance checks on fire extinguishers provided in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.1052 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $2176.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1052(d)(1)(i):Where methylene chloride was present in the workplace, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure, by either taking a personal breathing zone air sample of each employee's exposure; or taking personal breathing zone air samples that are representative of each employee's exposure:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure to Methylene Chloride by taking personal breathing zone air samples.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2176
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1052 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1052(h)(1):Where needed to prevent methylene chloride induced skin or eye irritation, the employer did not provide clean protective clothing and equipment resistant to methylene chloride, at no cost to the employee, and/or did not ensure that each affected employee used it:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, when methylene chloride, and products containing methylene chloride, were used, the employer did not provide protective clothing resistant to methylene chloride.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4351

1910.1052 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3729.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1052(i)(2):It was reasonably foreseeable that an employee's eyes may contact solutions containing 0.1 percent or greater methylene chloride and the employer did not provide appropriate eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for emergency use:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer used Methylene Chloride, and products that contained Methylene Chloride, for the purpose of cleaning paint screens and use as a product cement, in which both applications had reasonably foreseeable potential to contact an employee's eyes, and appropriate eyewash facilities were not located within the immediate work area for emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3729

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $1554.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  On and prior to September 16, 2021, employees worked with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Methylene Chloride and Denatured Alcohol, and the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1): Employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, employees worked with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Methylene Chloride and Denatured Alcohol, and the employer did not have safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, employees worked with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Methylene Chloride and Denatured Alcohol, and employees were not provided effective training and information on hazardous chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On and prior to September 16, 2021, employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(6):The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  On and prior to September 16, 2021, the employer did not certify that each forklift operator had been trained and evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345534705.